GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) vs Arc A730M
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
Popular choices:
Arc A730M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
Performance Per Dollar Arc A730M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Arc A730M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | Arc A730M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.2%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Turing (2018−2022) / 12nm) | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) and Arc A730M
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1485 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,119 points.
Arc A730M
The Arc A730M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,808 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) scores 10,119 and the Arc A730M reaches 9,808 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is built on Turing while the Arc A730M uses Generation 12.7, both on 12 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 3,072 (Arc A730M). Raw compute: 3.041 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 12.6 TFLOPS (Arc A730M). Boost clocks: 1485 MHz vs 2050 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | Arc A730M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,119+3% | 9,808 |
| Architecture | Turing | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 3072+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.041 TFLOPS | 12.6 TFLOPS+314% |
| Boost Clock | 1485 MHz | 2050 MHz+38% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 64 | 192+200% |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 4.5 MB+350% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 12 MB+1100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | Arc A730M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Arc A730M has 12 GB. The Arc A730M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 336 GB/s (Arc A730M) — a 16.7% advantage for the Arc A730M. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 12 MB (Arc A730M) — the Arc A730M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | Arc A730M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 12 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 336 GB/s+17% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 12 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 12.2 (Arc A730M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | Arc A730M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc A730M). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A730M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | Arc A730M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th Gen | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) draws 50W versus the Arc A730M's 80W — a 46.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 500W (Arc A730M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) | Arc A730M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-38% | 80W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 202.4+65% | 122.6 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) and Arc A730M
