GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)

#12

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#16

Radeon RX 7600S

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

86%

#19

Radeon RX 5600

MSRP: $229|Avg: $150

76%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%)
Longevity	🔮Strong Longevity (Turing (2018−2022) / 12nm)	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	🎮 High Capacity (6 GB)	🎮 High Capacity (4 GB)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) and GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1485 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,119 points.

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,186 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) scores 10,119 and the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER reaches 10,186 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER). Raw compute: 3.041 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 4.416 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER). Boost clocks: 1485 MHz vs 1725 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
G3D Mark Score	10,119	10,186
Architecture	Turing	Turing
Process Node	12 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	1024	1280+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.041 TFLOPS	4.416 TFLOPS+45%
Boost Clock	1485 MHz	1725 MHz+16%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	64	80+25%
L1 Cache	1 MB	1.3 MB+30%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile). Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+50%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	288 GB/s+50%	192 GB/s
Bus Width	192-bit+50%	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12.1
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Encoder	NVENC 6th Gen	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	NVDEC 4th Gen	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
TDP	50W-50%	100W
Recommended PSU	500W	350W-30%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	—	229mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	75	75°C
Perf/Watt	202.4+99%	101.9