GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) vs L4

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)

#12

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#16

Radeon RX 7600S

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

86%

#19

Radeon RX 5600

MSRP: $229|Avg: $150

76%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar L4

#81

Tesla T10

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $975

145%

#82

RTX A5000

MSRP: $3721|Avg: $1800

142%

#83

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

MSRP: $2200|Avg: $2200

140%

#84

Radeon PRO V710

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000

139%

#85

RTX A5500

MSRP: $3600|Avg: $2200

135%

#86

Radeon Pro WX 9100

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $550

129%

#87

A10G

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2000

126%

#88

Tesla T4

MSRP: $1880|Avg: $1000

125%

#89

Tesla M40 24GB

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $120

123%

#90

Quadro P5000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $400

118%

#91

RTX PRO 6000

MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565

116%

#92

RTX A6000

MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500

113%

#93

Quadro RTX A6000

MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500

113%

#94

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

MSRP: $6999|Avg: $4799

102%

#96

L4

MSRP: $2345|Avg: $1800

100%

#97

RTX 6000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $6799|Avg: $5500

97%

#98

RTX 5880 Ada Generation

MSRP: $6000|Avg: $6000

97%

#99

Tesla M40

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1099

94%

#100

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $3499

87%

#101

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition

MSRP: $11605|Avg: $8199

84%

#102

Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

MSRP: $4399|Avg: $3500

74%

#103

Radeon Pro W6800X Duo

MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999

68%

#104

Radeon Pro W6900X

MSRP: $6000|Avg: $5000

67%

#105

Quadro RTX 6000

MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1800

66%

#106

L40S

MSRP: $7500|Avg: $7500

62%

#107

Quadro P6000

MSRP: $5999|Avg: $1500

60%

#108

Quadro M6000

MSRP: $4999|Avg: $500

54%

#109

Quadro M6000 24GB

MSRP: $4999|Avg: $600

54%

#110

Quadro GV100

MSRP: $8999|Avg: $8999

49%

#111

Tesla P40

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $150

48%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The L4 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (8 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile).

Insight	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)	L4
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%)
Longevity	🔮Strong Longevity (Turing (2018−2022) / 12nm)	🔮Strong Longevity (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	🎮 High Capacity (6 GB)	🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the L4 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) Benchmark Check

L4 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) and L4

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1485 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,119 points.

L4

The L4 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 795 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 7424 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 72W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,153 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) scores 10,119 and the L4 reaches 10,153 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is built on Turing while the L4 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 7,424 (L4). Raw compute: 3.041 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 30.29 TFLOPS (L4). Boost clocks: 1485 MHz vs 2040 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)	L4
G3D Mark Score	10,119	10,153
Architecture	Turing	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	12 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	1024	7424+625%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.041 TFLOPS	30.29 TFLOPS+896%
Boost Clock	1485 MHz	2040 MHz+37%
ROPs	32	80+150%
TMUs	64	240+275%
L1 Cache	1 MB	7.5 MB+650%
L2 Cache	1 MB	48 MB+4700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)	L4
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the L4 has 8 GB. The L4 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 48 MB (L4) — the L4 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)	L4
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	8 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	192-bit+50%	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	48 MB+4700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 12.2 (L4). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)	L4
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (L4). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC (4x). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (L4).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)	L4
Encoder	NVENC 6th Gen	8th Gen NVENC (2x)
Decoder	NVDEC 4th Gen	5th Gen NVDEC (4x)
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) draws 50W versus the L4's 72W — a 36.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 500W (L4). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)	L4
TDP	50W-31%	72W
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	169mm
Height	—	69mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	75	75°C
Perf/Watt	202.4+44%	141.0