GeForce GTX 280M SLI
VS
GeForce 9800 GX2

GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs GeForce 9800 GX2

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 280M SLI

2009Core: 585 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 9800 GX2

2008Core: 500 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 280M SLI is positioned at rank 440 and the GeForce 9800 GX2 is on rank 691, so the GeForce GTX 280M SLI offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 280M SLI

#430
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1748%
#432
1585%
#433
1581%
#437
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1437%
#438
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1428%
#440
GeForce GTX 280M SLI
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#441
Radeon HD 8550G + 8600M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
100%
#443
Radeon R9 M360
MSRP: $300|Avg: $81
98%
#444
Radeon HD 8550G + 7600M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
97%
#445
Radeon R9 M365X
MSRP: $250|Avg: $50
95%
#446
GeForce 7800 GS
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
95%
#447
Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
95%
#448
Radeon R9 M265X
MSRP: $200|Avg: $30
94%
#449
Mobility Radeon HD 5165
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
93%
#450
Radeon R5 M435
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
92%
#451
Radeon E8860
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
90%
#452
Radeon R7 M380
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
90%
#453
GeForce 820A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
90%
#454
Radeon HD 7650A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $49
90%
#455
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9800 GX2

#681
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
10644%
#683
9649%
#684
9624%
#688
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
8751%
#689
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
8691%
#691
GeForce 9800 GX2
MSRP: $599|Avg: $75
100%
#692
GeForce 7900 GS
MSRP: $259|Avg: $50
99%
#693
MOBILITY RADEON X600
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
98%
#694
Mobility Radeon HD 4250
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
96%
#695
Mobility Radeon X2300 HD
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
96%
#696
Mobility Radeon X2300
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
96%
#697
Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $12
94%
#698
GeForce 8600 GTS
MSRP: $199|Avg: $35
91%
#699
GeForce 8800 GTX
MSRP: $599|Avg: $50
91%
#700
GeForce 8800 GTS
MSRP: $449|Avg: $50
89%
#701
Mobility Radeon HD 3450
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
89%
#702
GeForce 7650 GS
MSRP: $150|Avg: $15
87%
#703
GeForce 8600M GS
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
87%
#704
Mobility Radeon X1400
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
86%
#705
GeForce 8600 GT
MSRP: $159|Avg: $15
86%
#706
GeForce 7900 GT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 280M SLI is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score and 24900% more VRAM (512 MB vs 2 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9800 GX2.

InsightGeForce GTX 280M SLIGeForce 9800 GX2
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.3%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / G9x (2007−2010))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+24900%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 280M SLI remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 280M SLI and GeForce 9800 GX2

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 280M SLI

The GeForce GTX 280M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 2 2009. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 585 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 621 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce 9800 GX2

The GeForce 9800 GX2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 613 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 280M SLI scores 621 and the GeForce 9800 GX2 reaches 613 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 280M SLI is built on G9x while the GeForce 9800 GX2 uses G9x, both on 55 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce GTX 280M SLI) vs 224 (GeForce 9800 GX2).

FeatureGeForce GTX 280M SLIGeForce 9800 GX2
G3D Mark Score
621+1%
613
Architecture
G9x
G9x
Process Node
55 nm
65 nm
Shading Units
256+14%
224

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 280M SLIGeForce 9800 GX2
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 280M SLI comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 9800 GX2 has 2 MB. The GeForce GTX 280M SLI offers 24900% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 280M SLIGeForce 9800 GX2
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+24900%
0.002 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 280M SLI) vs 10.0 (GeForce 9800 GX2). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GTX 280M SLIGeForce 9800 GX2
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)+11%
10.0
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
2
3+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTX 280M SLI) vs No (GeForce 9800 GX2). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 280M SLI) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 9800 GX2).

FeatureGeForce GTX 280M SLIGeForce 9800 GX2
Encoder
PureVideo HD VP2
No
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP2
PureVideo HD VP2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
MPEG-2,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 280M SLI draws 150W versus the GeForce 9800 GX2's 150W — a 0% difference. The GeForce 9800 GX2 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 280M SLI) vs 350W (GeForce 9800 GX2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 95°C vs 105°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 280M SLIGeForce 9800 GX2
TDP
150W
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Length
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
95°C-10%
105°C
Perf/Watt
4.1
4.1
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 280M SLI is the newer GPU (2009 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce GTX 280M SLIGeForce 9800 GX2
MSRP
$599
Avg Price (30d)
$75
Codename
N10E-GTX
NB9E-GTX
Release
March 2 2009
July 15 2008
Ranking
#793
#825