GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 280M SLI

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 150W instead of 300W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $119 MSRP).

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B

2025

Why buy it

✅10.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($119 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌100% higher power demand at 300W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 10.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.3% in PassMark G3D (629 vs 621), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 55nm, 64 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2009. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 280M SLI

The GeForce GTX 280M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 2 2009. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 585 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 621 points.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 629 points. Launch price was $1,299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 280M SLI scores 621 and the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B reaches 629 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 280M SLI is built on G9x while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B uses Bristol Ridge, both on 55 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce GTX 280M SLI) vs 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B).

Feature	GeForce GTX 280M SLI	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
G3D Mark Score	621	629+1%
Architecture	G9x	Bristol Ridge
Process Node	55 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	256	4096+1500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 280M SLI gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 280M SLI	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GTX 280M SLI and System on the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B.

Feature	GeForce GTX 280M SLI	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	System

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 280M SLI draws 150W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B's 300W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 280M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 280M SLI) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 280M SLI	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
TDP	150W-50%	300W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	95°C	—
Perf/Watt	4.1+95%	2.1

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B (2025 vs 2009).

Feature	GeForce GTX 280M SLI	Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
MSRP	—	$119
Codename	N10E-GTX	Navi 48
Release	March 2 2009	July 23 2025
Ranking	#793	#23

Search GeForce GTX 280M SLI on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.