GeForce GTX 280M SLI
VS
GeForce GT 710

GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs GeForce GT 710

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 280M SLI

2009Core: 585 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 710

2014Core: 993 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 280M SLI is positioned at rank 440 and the GeForce GT 710 is on rank 87, so the GeForce GT 710 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 280M SLI

#430
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1748%
#432
1585%
#433
1581%
#437
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1437%
#438
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1428%
#440
GeForce GTX 280M SLI
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#441
Radeon HD 8550G + 8600M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
100%
#443
Radeon R9 M360
MSRP: $300|Avg: $81
98%
#444
Radeon HD 8550G + 7600M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
97%
#445
Radeon R9 M365X
MSRP: $250|Avg: $50
95%
#446
GeForce 7800 GS
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
95%
#447
Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
95%
#448
Radeon R9 M265X
MSRP: $200|Avg: $30
94%
#449
Mobility Radeon HD 5165
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
93%
#450
Radeon R5 M435
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
92%
#451
Radeon E8860
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
90%
#452
Radeon R7 M380
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
90%
#453
GeForce 820A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
90%
#454
Radeon HD 7650A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $49
90%
#455
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 710

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
410%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
394%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
389%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
389%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
388%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
386%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
381%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
379%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
376%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
375%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
370%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
370%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
363%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
363%
#72
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
452%
#79
Iris Xe Graphics MAX
MSRP: $55|Avg: $40
82%
#80
GeForce RTX 5090
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $2700
81%
#81
Moore Threads MTT S80
MSRP: $260|Avg: $170
78%
#87
GeForce GT 710
MSRP: $35|Avg: $50
100%
#89
GeForce GT 740
MSRP: $89|Avg: $89
91%
#90
Radeon R7 A8-7680
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
89%
#92
Radeon HD 7730
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
88%
#93
Radeon 540
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
83%
#97
Radeon R7 A8-7690K
MSRP: $80|Avg: $40
81%
#98
GeForce GT 1010
MSRP: $70|Avg: $70
79%
#99
Radeon R7 430
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
78%
#101
Radeon 550X
MSRP: $109|Avg: $45
76%
#102
GeForce GT 720
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
76%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 280M SLI is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 710 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GTX 280M SLIGeForce GT 710
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.3%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / G9x (2007−2010))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 280M SLI remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 280M SLI and GeForce GT 710

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 280M SLI

The GeForce GTX 280M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 2 2009. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 585 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 621 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 710

The GeForce GT 710 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 619 points. Launch price was $89.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 280M SLI scores 621 and the GeForce GT 710 reaches 619 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 280M SLI is built on G9x while the GeForce GT 710 uses Kepler, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce GTX 280M SLI) vs 384 (GeForce GT 710).

FeatureGeForce GTX 280M SLIGeForce GT 710
G3D Mark Score
621
619
Architecture
G9x
Kepler
Process Node
55 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
256
384+50%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 280M SLIGeForce GT 710
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 280M SLI comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 710 has 2 GB. The GeForce GT 710 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 280M SLIGeForce GT 710
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
2 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 280M SLI) vs 11.0 (GeForce GT 710). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GTX 280M SLIGeForce GT 710
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
11.0
OpenGL
3.3
4.5+36%
Max Displays
2
3+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTX 280M SLI) vs NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GT 710). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 280M SLI) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 710).

FeatureGeForce GTX 280M SLIGeForce GT 710
Encoder
PureVideo HD VP2
NVENC 1.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP2
PureVideo HD VP5
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 280M SLI draws 150W versus the GeForce GT 710's 64W — a 80.4% difference. The GeForce GT 710 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 280M SLI) vs 300W (GeForce GT 710). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Typical load temperature: 95°C vs 55°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 280M SLIGeForce GT 710
TDP
150W
64W-57%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
145mm
Height
69mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
95°C
55°C-42%
Perf/Watt
4.1
9.7+137%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GT 710 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2009).

FeatureGeForce GTX 280M SLIGeForce GT 710
MSRP
$35
Avg Price (30d)
$50
Codename
N10E-GTX
GK107
Release
March 2 2009
May 29 2014
Ranking
#793
#777