
GeForce GTX 280M SLI

Radeon HD 7570
GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs Radeon HD 7570 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs Radeon HD 7570 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs Radeon HD 7570: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 280M SLI
2009Why buy it
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 7570 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
Radeon HD 7570
2012Why buy it
- ✅10.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs Radeon HD 7570 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 280M SLI
The GeForce GTX 280M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 2 2009. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 585 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 621 points.

Radeon HD 7570
The Radeon HD 7570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 925 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 608 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 280M SLI scores 621 and the Radeon HD 7570 reaches 608 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 280M SLI is built on G9x while the Radeon HD 7570 uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce GTX 280M SLI) vs 2,048 (Radeon HD 7570).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 280M SLI | Radeon HD 7570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 621+2% | 608 |
| Architecture | G9x | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 2048+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 280M SLI gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 7570 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 280M SLI | Radeon HD 7570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 280M SLI has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7570 carries 1 GB. Radeon HD 7570 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GTX 280M SLI and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7570.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 280M SLI | Radeon HD 7570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 280M SLI) vs 11 (Radeon HD 7570). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 280M SLI | Radeon HD 7570 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4+33% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs UVD 3.1. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 280M SLI) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 7570).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 280M SLI | Radeon HD 7570 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | — |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 280M SLI draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 7570's 250W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GTX 280M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 280M SLI) vs 250W (Radeon HD 7570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 95°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 280M SLI | Radeon HD 7570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-40% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 250W-29% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 165mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 95°C | 75°C-21% |
| Perf/Watt | 4.1+71% | 2.4 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon HD 7570 (2012 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 280M SLI | Radeon HD 7570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $150 |
| Codename | N10E-GTX | Tahiti |
| Release | March 2 2009 | January 9 2012 |
| Ranking | #793 | #431 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














