
GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs Radeon R6

GeForce GTX 280M SLI
Popular choices:

Radeon R6
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 280M SLI is positioned at rank #440 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 280M SLI
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R6 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2009). The Radeon R6 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 280M SLI lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 280M SLI is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R6.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 280M SLI | Radeon R6 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / G9x (2007−2010)) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 280M SLI remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 280M SLI and Radeon R6

GeForce GTX 280M SLI
The GeForce GTX 280M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 2 2009. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 585 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 621 points.

Radeon R6
The Radeon R6 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 612 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 280M SLI scores 621 and the Radeon R6 reaches 612 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 280M SLI is built on G9x while the Radeon R6 uses GCN 4.0, both on 55 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce GTX 280M SLI) vs 512 (Radeon R6).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 280M SLI | Radeon R6 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 621+1% | 612 |
| Architecture | G9x | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 512+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 280M SLI | Radeon R6 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 280M SLI comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R6 has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 280M SLI offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 280M SLI | Radeon R6 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 280M SLI) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R6). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 280M SLI | Radeon R6 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0)+8% |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4+33% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTX 280M SLI) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R6). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 280M SLI) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX (Radeon R6).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 280M SLI | Radeon R6 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 280M SLI draws 150W versus the Radeon R6's 50W — a 100% difference. The Radeon R6 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 280M SLI) vs 350W (Radeon R6). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 95°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 280M SLI | Radeon R6 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 50W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 95°C | 65°C-32% |
| Perf/Watt | 4.1 | 12.2+198% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R6 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 280M SLI | Radeon R6 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $49 |
| Codename | N10E-GTX | Polaris 23 |
| Release | March 2 2009 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #793 | #757 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















