GeForce GTX 280M
VS
GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+

GeForce GTX 280M vs GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 280M

2008Core: 602 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+

2008Core: 500 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 280M is positioned at rank 120 and the GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+ is on rank 616, so the GeForce GTX 280M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 280M

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
693%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
666%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
658%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
657%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
655%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
652%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
643%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
641%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
635%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
633%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
626%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
624%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
613%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
613%
#84
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
94%
#105
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
764%
#120
GeForce GTX 280M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#122
GeForce GTS 450
MSRP: $129|Avg: $20
99%
#123
Radeon HD 8570D
MSRP: $40|Avg: $15
99%
#125
Radeon HD 8650G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
96%
#126
GeForce GT 630
MSRP: $69|Avg: $20
95%
#128
Radeon HD 6770
MSRP: $129|Avg: $129
94%
#129
GeForce GT 440
MSRP: $79|Avg: $40
93%
#130
Radeon R7 340
MSRP: $99|Avg: $25
93%
#133
Radeon HD 6750
MSRP: $109|Avg: $109
92%
#135
Radeon R5 240
MSRP: $59|Avg: $10
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+

#606
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
4360%
#608
3953%
#609
3942%
#613
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
3585%
#614
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
3560%
#616
GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+
MSRP: $229|Avg: $40
100%
#617
GeForce 9400
MSRP: $59|Avg: $15
100%
#618
GeForce 7350 LE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $10
99%
#620
Mobility Radeon HD 3850
MSRP: $150|Avg: $15
98%
#621
Mobility Radeon HD 4870
MSRP: $299|Avg: $20
97%
#622
GeForce 9800M GT
MSRP: $160|Avg: $5
96%
#623
94%
#624
Radeon HD 8550G + 8670M Dual
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
93%
#625
GeForce 8300 GS
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
92%
#626
91%
#627
90%
#628
GeForce 9500M GS
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
89%
#629
GeForce 8800 GS
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
88%
#631
GeForce 9800 GTX+
MSRP: $229|Avg: $50
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 280M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+.

InsightGeForce GTX 280MGeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.9%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 280M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 280M and GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 280M

The GeForce GTX 280M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 236W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 576 points. Launch price was $649.

NVIDIA

GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+

The GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+ is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 571 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 280M scores 576 and the GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+ reaches 571 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 280M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+ uses G9x, both on a 65 nm process. Shader units: 240 (GeForce GTX 280M) vs 224 (GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+).

FeatureGeForce GTX 280MGeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+
G3D Mark Score
576
571
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
G9x
Process Node
65 nm
65 nm
Shading Units
240+7%
224

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 280MGeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 280M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+ has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 280M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 280MGeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 280M) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GTX 280MGeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
11.1 (10_0)
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTX 280M) vs No NVENC (G92) (GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 280M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-1,MPEG-2,WMV (GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+).

FeatureGeForce GTX 280MGeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+
Encoder
PureVideo HD VP2
No NVENC (G92)
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP2
PureVideo HD VP2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-1,MPEG-2,WMV
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 280M draws 236W versus the GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+'s 150W — a 44.6% difference. The GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+ is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 280M) vs 350W (GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 280MGeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+
TDP
236W
150W-36%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
80°C-6%
Perf/Watt
2.4
3.8+58%