GeForce GTX 285M vs Radeon R7 M360 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 285M vs Radeon R7 M360 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 285M vs Radeon R7 M360: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 285M
2008Why buy it
- β 18.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- β2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $120 MSRP).
- β155% higher power demand at 204W vs 80W.
Radeon R7 M360
2015Why buy it
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($120 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
- β Draws 80W instead of 204W, a 124W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower average FPS than GeForce GTX 285M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 285M vs Radeon R7 M360 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 285M
The GeForce GTX 285M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 23 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 648 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 204W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 584 points. Launch price was $359.

Radeon R7 M360
The Radeon R7 M360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 585 points. Launch price was $109.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 285M scores 584 and the Radeon R7 M360 reaches 585 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 285M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon R7 M360 uses GCN 2.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (GeForce GTX 285M) vs 768 (Radeon R7 M360). Raw compute: 0.7085 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 285M) vs 1.613 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M360).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M | Radeon R7 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 584 | 585 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 768+220% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7085 TFLOPS | 1.613 TFLOPS+128% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+67% | 48 |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 285M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 M360 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M | Radeon R7 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 285M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M360 carries 4 GB. Radeon R7 M360 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 285M and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M360.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M | Radeon R7 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 4 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 285M) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R7 M360). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.2. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M | Radeon R7 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0)+8% |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GTX 285M) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 M360). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP2) vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 285M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon R7 M360).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M | Radeon R7 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP2) | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 285M draws 204W versus the Radeon R7 M360's 80W β a 87.3% difference. The Radeon R7 M360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 285M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M360). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M | Radeon R7 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 204W | 80W-61% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | β |
| Height | 0mm | β |
| Slots | 0 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | β |
| Perf/Watt | 2.9 | 7.3+152% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon R7 M360 (2015 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285M | Radeon R7 M360 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | β | $120 |
| Codename | GT200B | Tobago |
| Release | December 23 2008 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #771 | #576 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















