
GeForce GTX 260M SLI

GeForce GTX 285M
GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs GeForce GTX 285M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs GeForce GTX 285M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs GeForce GTX 285M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 260M SLI
2009Why buy it
- ✅7.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 204W, a 54W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
GeForce GTX 285M
2008Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 260M SLI across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌36% higher power demand at 204W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs GeForce GTX 285M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 260M SLI
The GeForce GTX 260M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 2 2009. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 588 points.

GeForce GTX 285M
The GeForce GTX 285M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 23 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 648 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 204W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 584 points. Launch price was $359.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 260M SLI scores 588 and the GeForce GTX 285M reaches 584 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 260M SLI is built on G9x while the GeForce GTX 285M uses Tesla 2.0, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 224 (GeForce GTX 260M SLI) vs 240 (GeForce GTX 285M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260M SLI | GeForce GTX 285M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 588 | 584 |
| Architecture | G9x | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 240+7% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260M SLI | GeForce GTX 285M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 260M SLI has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 285M carries 1 GB. GeForce GTX 285M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GTX 260M SLI and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 285M.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260M SLI | GeForce GTX 285M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 260M SLI) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 285M). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260M SLI | GeForce GTX 285M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTX 260M SLI) vs None (GeForce GTX 285M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs PureVideo HD (VP2). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 260M SLI) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 285M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260M SLI | GeForce GTX 285M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | PureVideo HD (VP2) |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 260M SLI draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 285M's 204W — a 30.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 260M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 260M SLI) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 285M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260M SLI | GeForce GTX 285M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-26% | 204W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | 85-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 3.9+34% | 2.9 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













