GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs Radeon HD 8610G + 8600M Dual
GeForce GTX 260M SLI
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 8610G + 8600M Dual
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 260M SLI is positioned at rank 343 and the Radeon HD 8610G + 8600M Dual is on rank 527, so the GeForce GTX 260M SLI offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 260M SLI
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8610G + 8600M Dual
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8610G + 8600M Dual is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 260M SLI | Radeon HD 8610G + 8600M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / G9x (2007−2010)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Legacy) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 8610G + 8600M Dual remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Radeon HD 8610G + 8600M Dual
GeForce GTX 260M SLI
The GeForce GTX 260M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 2 2009. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 588 points.
Radeon HD 8610G + 8600M Dual
The Radeon HD 8610G + 8600M Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 775 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 589 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 260M SLI scores 588 and the Radeon HD 8610G + 8600M Dual reaches 589 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 224 (GeForce GTX 260M SLI) vs 768 (Radeon HD 8610G + 8600M Dual).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260M SLI | Radeon HD 8610G + 8600M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 588 | 589 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 768+243% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260M SLI | Radeon HD 8610G + 8600M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260M SLI | Radeon HD 8610G + 8600M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 260M SLI) vs 11_1 (Radeon HD 8610G + 8600M Dual). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260M SLI | Radeon HD 8610G + 8600M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11_1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTX 260M SLI) vs UVD 3 (Radeon HD 8610G + 8600M Dual). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs UVD 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260M SLI | Radeon HD 8610G + 8600M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | UVD 3 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | UVD 3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 260M SLI draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 8610G + 8600M Dual's 50W — a 100% difference. The Radeon HD 8610G + 8600M Dual is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 260M SLI) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8610G + 8600M Dual). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260M SLI | Radeon HD 8610G + 8600M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 50W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.9 | 11.8+203% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 8610G + 8600M Dual is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260M SLI | Radeon HD 8610G + 8600M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $150 |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | — |
| Release | March 2 2009 | August 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #806 | #881 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Radeon HD 8610G + 8600M Dual
