GeForce GTX 260M SLI
VS
Radeon R7 M360

GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs Radeon R7 M360

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 260M SLI

2009Core: 550 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 M360

2015Boost: 1000 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 260M SLI is positioned at rank 343 and the Radeon R7 M360 is on rank 234, so the Radeon R7 M360 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 260M SLI

#333
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
923%
#335
837%
#336
835%
#340
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
759%
#341
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
754%
#343
GeForce GTX 260M SLI
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#344
GeForce 830A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
100%
#348
GeForce MX350
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
96%
#349
GeForce 840A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
95%
#350
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
94%
#351
HD Graphics 630
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
94%
#354
Radeon R7 M370
MSRP: $130|Avg: $40
93%
#357
Radeon 625
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M360

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
1486%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1428%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
1411%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1409%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1406%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
1398%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
1381%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1375%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1363%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
1359%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
1343%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1340%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
1316%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1315%
#99
Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
93%
#219
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
1639%
#234
Radeon R7 M360
MSRP: $120|Avg: $30
100%
#235
Radeon R4E
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
100%
#236
Radeon HD4650
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
98%
#237
Radeon HD 4850
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
97%
#238
Radeon R5 M240
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
97%
#239
Radeon HD 4350
MSRP: $35|Avg: $10
97%
#240
RADEON HD 6350
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
96%
#241
Radeon HD 4870
MSRP: $299|Avg: $25
95%
#244
Radeon HD 7560D
MSRP: $101|Avg: $15
92%
#246
GeForce GTS 250
MSRP: $129|Avg: $20
90%
#248
GeForce G100
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
90%
#249
Radeon R7 M265
MSRP: $130|Avg: $30
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon R7 M360 is significantly newer (2015 vs 2009). The Radeon R7 M360 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 260M SLI lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 260M SLI is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R7 M360 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GTX 260M SLIRadeon R7 M360
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.5%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / G9x (2007−2010))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+700%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 260M SLI remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Radeon R7 M360

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 260M SLI

The GeForce GTX 260M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 2 2009. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 588 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 M360

The Radeon R7 M360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 585 points. Launch price was $109.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 260M SLI scores 588 and the Radeon R7 M360 reaches 585 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 260M SLI is built on G9x while the Radeon R7 M360 uses GCN 2.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce GTX 260M SLI) vs 768 (Radeon R7 M360).

FeatureGeForce GTX 260M SLIRadeon R7 M360
G3D Mark Score
588
585
Architecture
G9x
GCN 2.0
Process Node
55 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
224
768+243%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 260M SLIRadeon R7 M360
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 260M SLI comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M360 has 4 GB. The Radeon R7 M360 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 260M SLIRadeon R7 M360
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
4 GB+700%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 260M SLI) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R7 M360). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce GTX 260M SLIRadeon R7 M360
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (12_0)+8%
OpenGL
3.3
4.6+39%
Max Displays
2
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTX 260M SLI) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 M360). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 260M SLI) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon R7 M360).

FeatureGeForce GTX 260M SLIRadeon R7 M360
Encoder
PureVideo HD VP2
VCE 1.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP2
UVD 4.0
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 260M SLI draws 150W versus the Radeon R7 M360's 80W — a 60.9% difference. The Radeon R7 M360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 260M SLI) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M360). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

FeatureGeForce GTX 260M SLIRadeon R7 M360
TDP
150W
80W-47%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
90°C
Perf/Watt
3.9
7.3+87%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R7 M360 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2009).

FeatureGeForce GTX 260M SLIRadeon R7 M360
MSRP
$120
Avg Price (30d)
$30
Codename
NB9E-GTX
Tobago
Release
March 2 2009
June 18 2015
Ranking
#806
#576