GeForce GTX 260M SLI
VS
Radeon R5 M330

GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs Radeon R5 M330

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 260M SLI

2009Core: 550 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 M330

2015

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 260M SLI is positioned at rank 343 and the Radeon R5 M330 is on rank 480, so the GeForce GTX 260M SLI offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 260M SLI

#333
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
923%
#335
837%
#336
835%
#340
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
759%
#341
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
754%
#343
GeForce GTX 260M SLI
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#344
GeForce 830A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
100%
#348
GeForce MX350
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
96%
#349
GeForce 840A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
95%
#350
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
94%
#351
HD Graphics 630
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
94%
#354
Radeon R7 M370
MSRP: $130|Avg: $40
93%
#357
Radeon 625
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 M330

#469
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
2185%
#471
1980%
#472
1975%
#476
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1796%
#477
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1784%
#479
Radeon HD 8510G + 8500M Dual
MSRP: $120|Avg: $35
100%
#480
Radeon R5 M330
MSRP: $120|Avg: $20
100%
#481
Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
100%
#482
GeForce GTX 760A
MSRP: $249|Avg: $40
99%
#483
Radeon R9 M270X
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
97%
#484
Mobility Radeon HD 5470
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
97%
#485
Radeon R7 M260
MSRP: $110|Avg: $110
96%
#486
96%
#487
96%
#488
Radeon R7 A10-7800
MSRP: $155|Avg: $30
96%
#489
Radeon HD 8450G + 8670M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
96%
#490
95%
#491
Radeon HD 6450A
MSRP: $55|Avg: $15
95%
#492
95%
#493
94%
#494
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon R5 M330 is significantly newer (2015 vs 2009). The Radeon R5 M330 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 260M SLI lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R5 M330 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 260M SLI.

InsightGeForce GTX 260M SLIRadeon R5 M330
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%)
Leading raw performance (+1.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / G9x (2007−2010))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN (2012−2015))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+700%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R5 M330 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Radeon R5 M330

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 260M SLI

The GeForce GTX 260M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 2 2009. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 588 points.

AMD

Radeon R5 M330

The Radeon R5 M330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 596 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 260M SLI scores 588 and the Radeon R5 M330 reaches 596 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 260M SLI is built on G9x while the Radeon R5 M330 uses GCN, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce GTX 260M SLI) vs 1,024 (Radeon R5 M330).

FeatureGeForce GTX 260M SLIRadeon R5 M330
G3D Mark Score
588
596+1%
Architecture
G9x
GCN
Process Node
55 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
224
1024+357%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 260M SLIRadeon R5 M330
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 260M SLI comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 M330 has 4 GB. The Radeon R5 M330 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 260M SLIRadeon R5 M330
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
4 GB+700%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 260M SLI) vs 12 (FL11_1) (Radeon R5 M330). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GTX 260M SLIRadeon R5 M330
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (FL11_1)+8%
OpenGL
3.3
4.4+33%
Max Displays
2
3+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTX 260M SLI) vs UVD (Radeon R5 M330). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs VCE. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 260M SLI) vs H.264,HEVC,MPEG-4,MVC (Radeon R5 M330).

FeatureGeForce GTX 260M SLIRadeon R5 M330
Encoder
PureVideo HD VP2
UVD
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP2
VCE
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,HEVC,MPEG-4,MVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 260M SLI draws 150W versus the Radeon R5 M330's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon R5 M330 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 260M SLI) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M330). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 95°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 260M SLIRadeon R5 M330
TDP
150W
75W-50%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
90°C-5%
95°C
Perf/Watt
3.9
7.9+103%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R5 M330 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2009).

FeatureGeForce GTX 260M SLIRadeon R5 M330
MSRP
$120
Avg Price (30d)
$20
Codename
NB9E-GTX
Pitcairn
Release
March 2 2009
June 9 2015
Ranking
#806
#522