GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs Radeon R5 A6-8500P

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs Radeon R5 A6-8500P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs Radeon R5 A6-8500P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 260M SLI

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 A6-8500P across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Radeon R5 A6-8500P

2020

Why buy it

✅9.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅GeForce GTX 260M SLI is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R5 A6-8500P is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌66.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R5 A6-8500P is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 9.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 260M SLI instead at 588 vs 587, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R5 A6-8500P is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 55nm, 60 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2009. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 A6-8500P makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs Radeon R5 A6-8500P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 260M SLI

The GeForce GTX 260M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 2 2009. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 588 points.

Radeon R5 A6-8500P

The Radeon R5 A6-8500P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 587 points. Launch price was $579.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 260M SLI scores 588 and the Radeon R5 A6-8500P reaches 587 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 260M SLI is built on G9x while the Radeon R5 A6-8500P uses RDNA 2.0, both on 55 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce GTX 260M SLI) vs 3,840 (Radeon R5 A6-8500P).

Feature	GeForce GTX 260M SLI	Radeon R5 A6-8500P
G3D Mark Score	588	587
Architecture	G9x	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	55 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	224	3840+1614%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 260M SLI gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 A6-8500P leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 260M SLI	Radeon R5 A6-8500P
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GTX 260M SLI and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 A6-8500P.

Feature	GeForce GTX 260M SLI	Radeon R5 A6-8500P
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 260M SLI draws 150W versus the Radeon R5 A6-8500P's 250W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GTX 260M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 260M SLI) vs 350W (Radeon R5 A6-8500P). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	GeForce GTX 260M SLI	Radeon R5 A6-8500P
TDP	150W-40%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	90°C	—
Perf/Watt	3.9+70%	2.3

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R5 A6-8500P (2020 vs 2009).

Feature	GeForce GTX 260M SLI	Radeon R5 A6-8500P
MSRP	—	$100
Codename	NB9E-GTX	Navi 21
Release	March 2 2009	October 28 2020
Ranking	#806	#65

Search GeForce GTX 260M SLI on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 A6-8500P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.