GeForce GTX 460M SLI vs GeForce GTX 660M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460M SLI

2010Core: 675 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 660M

2012Core: 835 MHzBoost: 950 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 460M SLI vs GeForce GTX 660M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 460M SLI vs GeForce GTX 660M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 460M SLI vs GeForce GTX 660M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 460M SLI

2010

Why buy it

  • 122.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

GeForce GTX 660M

2012

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 460M SLI across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 460M SLI is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 122.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 660M instead at 1,452 vs 1,393, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 460M SLI is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 660M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 660M is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 460M SLI has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 460M SLI vs GeForce GTX 660M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460M SLI

The GeForce GTX 460M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 3 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,393 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 660M

The GeForce GTX 660M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 835 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,452 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 460M SLI scores 1,393 and the GeForce GTX 660M reaches 1,452 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 460M SLI is built on Fermi while the GeForce GTX 660M uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 460M SLI) vs 384 (GeForce GTX 660M).

FeatureGeForce GTX 460M SLIGeForce GTX 660M
G3D Mark Score
1,393
1,452+4%
Architecture
Fermi
Kepler
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
384

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 460M SLIGeForce GTX 660M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 460M SLI has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 660M carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 660M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 460M SLI and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 660M.

FeatureGeForce GTX 460M SLIGeForce GTX 660M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
2 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 460M SLI) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 660M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 460M SLIGeForce GTX 660M
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
2
4+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 460M SLI) vs NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 660M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 460M SLI) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 660M).

FeatureGeForce GTX 460M SLIGeForce GTX 660M
Encoder
PureVideo HD VP4
NVENC 1st Gen
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
PureVideo HD VP5
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 460M SLI draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 660M's 50W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX 660M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 460M SLI) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 660M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 60°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 460M SLIGeForce GTX 660M
TDP
75W
50W-33%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
60°C-29%
Perf/Watt
18.6
29.0+56%