GeForce GTX 460M SLI vs Tesla M2090

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460M SLI

2010Core: 675 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla M2090

2011Core: 651 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 460M SLI vs Tesla M2090 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 460M SLI vs Tesla M2090: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 460M SLI

2010

Why buy it

  • Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).

Tesla M2090

2011

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • More future proof: Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Tesla M2090 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.5% in PassMark G3D (1,400 vs 1,393), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 460M SLI is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Tesla M2090 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Tesla M2090 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 460M SLI has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 460M SLI vs Tesla M2090 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460M SLI

The GeForce GTX 460M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 3 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,393 points.

NVIDIA

Tesla M2090

The Tesla M2090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 651 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,400 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 460M SLI scores 1,393 and the Tesla M2090 reaches 1,400 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 460M SLI is built on Fermi while the Tesla M2090 uses Fermi 2.0, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 460M SLI) vs 512 (Tesla M2090).

FeatureGeForce GTX 460M SLITesla M2090
G3D Mark Score
1,393
1,400
Architecture
Fermi
Fermi 2.0
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
512+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 460M SLI gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Tesla M2090 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 460M SLITesla M2090
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 460M SLI and 64-bit on the Tesla M2090.

FeatureGeForce GTX 460M SLITesla M2090
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 460M SLI) vs 12 (FL 11_0) (Tesla M2090). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce GTX 460M SLITesla M2090
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (FL 11_0)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
2
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 460M SLI) vs CUDA,OpenCL (Tesla M2090).

FeatureGeForce GTX 460M SLITesla M2090
Encoder
PureVideo HD VP4
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
CUDA,OpenCL
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 460M SLI draws 75W versus the Tesla M2090's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 460M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 460M SLI) vs 350W (Tesla M2090). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 460M SLITesla M2090
TDP
75W-70%
250W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
248mm
Height
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
18.6+232%
5.6
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Tesla M2090 (2011 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GTX 460M SLITesla M2090
MSRP
$2500
Codename
N11E-GS
GF110
Release
September 3 2010
July 25 2011
Ranking
#696
#530

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.