
GeForce GTX 460M SLI

Radeon HD 5770
GeForce GTX 460M SLI vs Radeon HD 5770 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 460M SLI vs Radeon HD 5770 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 460M SLI vs Radeon HD 5770: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 460M SLI
2010Why buy it
- ✅99.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 108W, a 33W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
Radeon HD 5770
2009Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 460M SLI across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2009 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌44% higher power demand at 108W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 460M SLI vs Radeon HD 5770 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 460M SLI
The GeForce GTX 460M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 3 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,393 points.

Radeon HD 5770
The Radeon HD 5770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,348 points. Launch price was $159.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 460M SLI scores 1,393 and the Radeon HD 5770 reaches 1,348 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 460M SLI is built on Fermi while the Radeon HD 5770 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 460M SLI) vs 800 (Radeon HD 5770).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460M SLI | Radeon HD 5770 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,393+3% | 1,348 |
| Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 800+108% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 460M SLI gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 5770 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460M SLI | Radeon HD 5770 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 460M SLI has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 5770 carries 2 GB. Radeon HD 5770 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 460M SLI and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 5770.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460M SLI | Radeon HD 5770 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 460M SLI) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 5770). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460M SLI | Radeon HD 5770 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0)+7% | 11.2 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 460M SLI) vs UVD 2.2 (Radeon HD 5770). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 460M SLI) vs H.264 (Radeon HD 5770).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460M SLI | Radeon HD 5770 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | UVD 2.2 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 460M SLI draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 5770's 108W — a 36.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 460M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 460M SLI) vs 450W (Radeon HD 5770). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460M SLI | Radeon HD 5770 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-31% | 108W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 208mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 18.6+49% | 12.5 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce GTX 460M SLI (2010 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460M SLI | Radeon HD 5770 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $159 |
| Codename | N11E-GS | Juniper |
| Release | September 3 2010 | October 13 2009 |
| Ranking | #696 | #730 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















