GeForce GTX 470M SLI vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 470M SLI vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 470M SLI vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 470M SLI

2010

Why buy it

✅43.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Draws 75W instead of 110W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 16.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 650 Ti

2012

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 470M SLI across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌46.7% higher power demand at 110W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 470M SLI is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 43.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.6% in PassMark G3D (2,540 vs 2,525), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 470M SLI is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 650 Ti makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 650 Ti is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 470M SLI has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 470M SLI vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 470M SLI

The GeForce GTX 470M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 1 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 535 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,540 points.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 9 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 928 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,525 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 470M SLI scores 2,540 and the GeForce GTX 650 Ti reaches 2,525 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 470M SLI is built on Fermi while the GeForce GTX 650 Ti uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 576 (GeForce GTX 470M SLI) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti).

Feature	GeForce GTX 470M SLI	GeForce GTX 650 Ti
G3D Mark Score	2,540	2,525
Architecture	Fermi	Kepler
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	576	768+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 470M SLI	GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 470M SLI and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 650 Ti.

Feature	GeForce GTX 470M SLI	GeForce GTX 650 Ti
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	86.4 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11 (GeForce GTX 470M SLI) vs 11.0 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti). Vulkan: None vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.0 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GTX 470M SLI	GeForce GTX 650 Ti
DirectX	11	11.0
Vulkan	None	1.2
OpenGL	4.0	4.6+15%
Max Displays	3	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GTX 470M SLI) vs NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GTX 650 Ti). Decoder: VP4 vs PureVideo VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 470M SLI) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti).

Feature	GeForce GTX 470M SLI	GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Encoder	None	NVENC (1st Gen)
Decoder	VP4	PureVideo VP5
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 470M SLI draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 650 Ti's 110W — a 37.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 470M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 470M SLI) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 650 Ti). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 145mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90 vs 70.

Feature	GeForce GTX 470M SLI	GeForce GTX 650 Ti
TDP	75W-32%	110W
Recommended PSU	350W-13%	400W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin
Length	0mm	145mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	90	70-22%
Perf/Watt	33.9+47%	23.0

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 650 Ti (2012 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce GTX 470M SLI	GeForce GTX 650 Ti
MSRP	—	$149
Codename	N11E-GT	GK106
Release	November 1 2010	October 9 2012
Ranking	#627	#633

Search GeForce GTX 470M SLI on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 650 Ti on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.