GeForce GTX 470M SLI vs GRID K240Q

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 470M SLI

2010Core: 535 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS

GRID K240Q

2013Core: 745 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 470M SLI vs GRID K240Q Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 470M SLI vs GRID K240Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 470M SLI

2010

Why buy it

  • Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

GRID K240Q

2013

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GRID K240Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0% in PassMark G3D (2,541 vs 2,540), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 470M SLI is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID K240Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID K240Q is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 470M SLI has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 470M SLI vs GRID K240Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 470M SLI

The GeForce GTX 470M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 1 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 535 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,540 points.

NVIDIA

GRID K240Q

The GRID K240Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,541 points. Launch price was $469.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 470M SLI scores 2,540 and the GRID K240Q reaches 2,541 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 470M SLI is built on Fermi while the GRID K240Q uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 576 (GeForce GTX 470M SLI) vs 1,536 (GRID K240Q).

FeatureGeForce GTX 470M SLIGRID K240Q
G3D Mark Score
2,540
2,541
Architecture
Fermi
Kepler
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
576
1536+167%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 470M SLI gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID K240Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 470M SLIGRID K240Q
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 470M SLI and 64-bit on the GRID K240Q.

FeatureGeForce GTX 470M SLIGRID K240Q
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11 (GeForce GTX 470M SLI) vs 11_0 (GRID K240Q). OpenGL: 4.0 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce GTX 470M SLIGRID K240Q
DirectX
11
11_0
OpenGL
4.0
4.6+15%
Max Displays
3
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 470M SLI) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GRID K240Q).

FeatureGeForce GTX 470M SLIGRID K240Q
Encoder
None
Decoder
VP4
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 470M SLI draws 75W versus the GRID K240Q's 225W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 470M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 470M SLI) vs 350W (GRID K240Q). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 90 vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 470M SLIGRID K240Q
TDP
75W-67%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
1mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
90
80°C-11%
Perf/Watt
33.9+200%
11.3
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GRID K240Q (2013 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GTX 470M SLIGRID K240Q
MSRP
$500
Codename
N11E-GT
GK104
Release
November 1 2010
June 28 2013
Ranking
#627
#628

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.