
GeForce GTX 570M
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 2100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 570M is positioned at rank 81 and the Radeon Pro WX 2100 is on rank 118, so the GeForce GTX 570M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 570M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 2100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2011). The Radeon Pro WX 2100 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 570M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 570M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro WX 2100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 570M | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 570M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 570M and Radeon Pro WX 2100

GeForce GTX 570M
The GeForce GTX 570M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 575 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points.

Radeon Pro WX 2100
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,871 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 570M scores 1,880 and the Radeon Pro WX 2100 reaches 1,871 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 570M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 2100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 570M) vs 512 (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Raw compute: 0.7728 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 570M) vs 1.248 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 2100).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570M | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,880 | 1,871 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 336 | 512+52% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7728 TFLOPS | 1.248 TFLOPS+61% |
| ROPs | 24+50% | 16 |
| TMUs | 56+75% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB+250% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB+50% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570M | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 570M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 2100 has 2 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GTX 570M) vs 256 KB (Radeon Pro WX 2100) — the GeForce GTX 570M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570M | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1.5 GB | 2 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB+50% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 570M) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570M | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 570M) vs VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 570M) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 2100).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570M | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | VCE 3.4 (Polaris) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 570M draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro WX 2100's 35W — a 72.7% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 570M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570M | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 35W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | 80°C-11% |
| Perf/Watt | 25.1 | 53.5+113% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 570M | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $45 |
| Codename | GF114 | Lexa |
| Release | June 28 2011 | June 4 2017 |
| Ranking | #699 | #702 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















