GeForce GTX 580M SLI vs Radeon R9 M360

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 580M SLI

2011Core: 620 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M360

2015Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz

GeForce GTX 580M SLI vs Radeon R9 M360 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 580M SLI vs Radeon R9 M360 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 580M SLI vs Radeon R9 M360: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 580M SLI

2011

Why buy it

  • 109.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • 33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.

Radeon R9 M360

2015

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 580M SLI across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 580M SLI is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 109.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R9 M360 instead at 1,819 vs 1,771, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 580M SLI is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 M360 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M360 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 580M SLI has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 580M SLI vs Radeon R9 M360 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 580M SLI

The GeForce GTX 580M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 6 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,771 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 M360

The Radeon R9 M360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,819 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 580M SLI scores 1,771 and the Radeon R9 M360 reaches 1,819 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 580M SLI is built on Fermi while the Radeon R9 M360 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 580M SLI) vs 512 (Radeon R9 M360).

FeatureGeForce GTX 580M SLIRadeon R9 M360
G3D Mark Score
1,771
1,819+3%
Architecture
Fermi
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
768+50%
512

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 580M SLI gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 M360 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 580M SLIRadeon R9 M360
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 580M SLI and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M360.

FeatureGeForce GTX 580M SLIRadeon R9 M360
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 580M SLI) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 M360). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce GTX 580M SLIRadeon R9 M360
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12_0
Max Displays
2
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 580M SLI) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 M360). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 3.1.

FeatureGeForce GTX 580M SLIRadeon R9 M360
Encoder
PureVideo HD VP4
VCE 1.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
UVD 3.1
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 580M SLI draws 100W versus the Radeon R9 M360's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon R9 M360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 580M SLI) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M360). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.

FeatureGeForce GTX 580M SLIRadeon R9 M360
TDP
100W
75W-25%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
Mobile
Length
1mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
90°C
Perf/Watt
17.7
24.3+37%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R9 M360 (2015 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GTX 580M SLIRadeon R9 M360
MSRP
$300
Codename
N12E-GTX2
Tropo
Release
January 6 2011
May 5 2015
Ranking
#509
#711

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.