
GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
Popular choices:

GRID M60-8Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 225W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GRID M60-8Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌125% higher power demand at 225W vs 100W.
GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
2013GRID M60-8Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 225W, a 125W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌125% higher power demand at 225W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition better than GRID M60-8Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GRID M60-8Q make more sense than GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition | GRID M60-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition | GRID M60-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 101 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 44 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 16 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 11 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 8 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 24 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition | GRID M60-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 44 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition | GRID M60-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 56 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 34 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition and GRID M60-8Q

GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
The GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 797 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,927 points.

GRID M60-8Q
GRID M60-8Q
The GRID M60-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,884 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition scores 3,927 and the GRID M60-8Q reaches 3,884 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition is built on Kepler while the GRID M60-8Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-8Q). Raw compute: 2.142 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-8Q).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition | GRID M60-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,927+1% | 3,884 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1344 | 2048+52% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.142 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+125% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 112 | 128+14% |
| L1 Cache | 112 KB | 768 KB+586% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GRID M60-8Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition | GRID M60-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition) vs 2 MB (GRID M60-8Q) — the GRID M60-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition | GRID M60-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition draws 100W versus the GRID M60-8Q's 225W — a 76.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition) vs 350W (GRID M60-8Q). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition | GRID M60-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-56% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 39.3+127% | 17.3 |
Value Analysis
The GRID M60-8Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition | GRID M60-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Codename | GK104 | GM204 |
| Release | November 8 2013 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #803 | #505 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












