GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition vs Quadro K5000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition vs Quadro K5000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition vs Quadro K5000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 100W instead of 122W, a 22W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K5000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).

Quadro K5000

2012

Why buy it

✅1.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌22% higher power demand at 122W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K5000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (3,989 vs 3,927), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2013 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro K5000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro K5000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition vs Quadro K5000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

The GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 797 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,927 points.

Quadro K5000

The Quadro K5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 17 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 706 MHz to 706 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,989 points. Launch price was $2,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition scores 3,927 and the Quadro K5000 reaches 3,989 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition is built on Kepler while the Quadro K5000 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition) vs 1,536 (Quadro K5000). Raw compute: 2.142 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition) vs 2.169 TFLOPS (Quadro K5000).

Feature	GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition	Quadro K5000
G3D Mark Score	3,927	3,989+2%
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1344	1536+14%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.142 TFLOPS	2.169 TFLOPS+1%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	112	128+14%
L1 Cache	112 KB	128 KB+14%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K5000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition	Quadro K5000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K5000 carries 4 GB. Quadro K5000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition and 64-bit on the Quadro K5000.

Feature	GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition	Quadro K5000
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit+300%	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition draws 100W versus the Quadro K5000's 122W — a 19.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition) vs 350W (Quadro K5000). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition	Quadro K5000
TDP	100W-18%	122W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	—	267mm
Slots	—	2
Perf/Watt	39.3+20%	32.7

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition (2013 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition	Quadro K5000
MSRP	—	$2499
Codename	GK104	GK104
Release	November 8 2013	August 17 2012
Ranking	#803	#492

Search GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition on Amazon

Search Quadro K5000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.