
GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition vs Radeon RX 460

GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 460
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition is positioned at rank #385 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 460 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 460 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition and Radeon RX 460

GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
The GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 797 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,927 points.

Radeon RX 460
The Radeon RX 460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1090 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,099 points. Launch price was $86.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition scores 3,927 and the Radeon RX 460 reaches 4,099 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX 460 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition) vs 896 (Radeon RX 460). Raw compute: 2.142 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition) vs 2.15 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 460).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,927 | 4,099+4% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1344+50% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.142 TFLOPS | 2.15 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 112+100% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 112 KB | 224 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 460 has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 460 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 160 GB/s (GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition) vs 112 GB/s (Radeon RX 460) — a 42.9% advantage for the GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 460) — the Radeon RX 460 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 160 GB/s+43% | 112 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition draws 100W versus the Radeon RX 460's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon RX 460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition) vs 350W (Radeon RX 460). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 75W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Length | — | 170mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 39.3 | 54.7+39% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 460 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $110 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $35 |
| Codename | GK104 | Baffin |
| Release | November 8 2013 | August 8 2016 |
| Ranking | #803 | #485 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















