GeForce GTX 780M
VS
Radeon RX Vega M GL

GeForce GTX 780M vs Radeon RX Vega M GL

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 780M

2013Core: 823 MHzBoost: 797 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon RX Vega M GL

2018Core: 931 MHzBoost: 1011 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 780M is positioned at rank 212 and the Radeon RX Vega M GL is on rank 208, so the Radeon RX Vega M GL offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 780M

#52
Radeon 8060S
MSRP: $800|Avg: $800
88%
#202
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
424%
#204
384%
#205
383%
#209
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
348%
#210
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
346%
#212
GeForce GTX 780M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60
100%
#216
Radeon 8040S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
95%
#217
Radeon R7 +8G
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
95%
#221
Radeon HD 6550A
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
92%
#222
91%
#224
GeForce GT 640M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX Vega M GL

#198
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
417%
#200
378%
#201
377%
#205
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
343%
#206
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
340%
#208
Radeon RX Vega M GL
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
100%
#212
GeForce GTX 780M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60
98%
#216
Radeon 8040S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
94%
#217
Radeon R7 +8G
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
93%
#221
Radeon HD 6550A
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
91%
#222
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon RX Vega M GL uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX Vega M GL likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 780M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon RX Vega M GL is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 780M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GTX 780MRadeon RX Vega M GL
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%)
Leading raw performance (+1.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 780M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $150 for the Radeon RX Vega M GL, it costs 60% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 146.1% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GTX 780MRadeon RX Vega M GL
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+146.1%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($60)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 780M and Radeon RX Vega M GL

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 780M

The GeForce GTX 780M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 823 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,845 points.

AMD

Radeon RX Vega M GL

The Radeon RX Vega M GL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 931 MHz to 1011 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,906 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 780M scores 3,845 and the Radeon RX Vega M GL reaches 3,906 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780M is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX Vega M GL uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 780M) vs 1,280 (Radeon RX Vega M GL). Raw compute: 2.448 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780M) vs 2.588 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GL). Boost clocks: 797 MHz vs 1011 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780MRadeon RX Vega M GL
G3D Mark Score
3,845
3,906+2%
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1536+20%
1280
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.448 TFLOPS
2.588 TFLOPS+6%
Boost Clock
797 MHz
1011 MHz+27%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
128+60%
80
L1 Cache
128 KB
320 KB+150%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 780MRadeon RX Vega M GL
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 780M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega M GL has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 780M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 160 GB/s (GeForce GTX 780M) vs 179.2 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega M GL) — a 12% advantage for the Radeon RX Vega M GL. Bus width: 256-bit vs 1024-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780M) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX Vega M GL) — the Radeon RX Vega M GL has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780MRadeon RX Vega M GL
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
HBM2
Memory Bandwidth
160 GB/s
179.2 GB/s+12%
Bus Width
256-bit
1024-bit+300%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 780M) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega M GL). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780MRadeon RX Vega M GL
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
6+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GTX 780M) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GL). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 780M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega M GL).

FeatureGeForce GTX 780MRadeon RX Vega M GL
Encoder
1st Gen NVENC (Kepler)
VCE 3.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
UVD 6.3
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,H.265,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 780M draws 122W versus the Radeon RX Vega M GL's 65W — a 61% difference. The Radeon RX Vega M GL is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 780M) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GL). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780MRadeon RX Vega M GL
TDP
122W
65W-47%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
Integrated
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
80
Perf/Watt
31.5
60.1+91%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 780M costs 60% less ($90 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 64.1 (GeForce GTX 780M) vs 26.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GL) — the GeForce GTX 780M offers 146.5% better value. The Radeon RX Vega M GL is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 780MRadeon RX Vega M GL
MSRP
$150
Avg Price (30d)
$60-60%
$150
Performance per Dollar
64.1+147%
26.0
Codename
GK104
Polaris 22
Release
May 11 2013
February 1 2018
Ranking
#511
#500