GeForce GTX 870M
VS
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

GeForce GTX 870M vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 870M

2014Core: 941 MHzBoost: 967 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020Core: 1410 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 870M is positioned at rank #143 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 870M

#39
Radeon RX 7700S
MSRP: $449|Avg: $350
98%
#133
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
307%
#135
278%
#136
278%
#140
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
252%
#141
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
251%
#143
GeForce GTX 870M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#145
Radeon RX 580 (móvel)
MSRP: $229|Avg: $65
99%
#147
GeForce GT 630M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $35
98%
#150
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
96%
#157
GeForce 830M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
95%
#158
GeForce GT 750M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
100%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
96%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
95%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
95%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
95%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
94%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
93%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
93%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
92%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
91%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
90%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
90%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
89%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
88%
#15
Radeon RX 6500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
88%
#16
GeForce RTX 3070
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is significantly newer (2020 vs 2014). The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 870M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 474.4% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (8 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 870M.

InsightGeForce GTX 870MGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-474.4%)
Leading raw performance (+474.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 870M and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 870M

The GeForce GTX 870M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,536 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 870M scores 3,536 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 474.4%. The GeForce GTX 870M is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 870M) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Raw compute: 2.599 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 870M) vs 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Boost clocks: 967 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 870MGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
G3D Mark Score
3,536
20,312+474%
Architecture
Kepler
Ampere
Process Node
28 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
1344
4864+262%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.599 TFLOPS
16.2 TFLOPS+523%
Boost Clock
967 MHz
1665 MHz+72%
ROPs
24
80+233%
TMUs
112
152+36%
L1 Cache
0.11 MB
4.8 MB+4264%
L2 Cache
0.38 MB
4 MB+953%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 870MGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
DLSS 2.0
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 870M comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (GeForce GTX 870M) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 870MGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
VRAM Capacity
6 GB
8 GB+33%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
448 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
0.38 MB
4 MB+953%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 870M) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 870MGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GTX 870M) vs NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs NVDEC (Ampere). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 870M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti).

FeatureGeForce GTX 870MGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Encoder
1st Gen NVENC (Kepler)
NVENC (Ampere)
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
NVDEC (Ampere)
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 870M draws 100W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 870M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 870M) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75.

FeatureGeForce GTX 870MGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
TDP
100W-50%
200W
Recommended PSU
350W-42%
600W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
8-pin
Length
242mm
Height
112mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
75-12%
Perf/Watt
35.4
101.6+187%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce GTX 870MGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP
$399
Avg Price (30d)
$280
Codename
GK104
GA104
Release
March 12 2014
December 1 2020
Ranking
#538
#73