
GeForce GTX 870M

GRID T4-2Q
GeForce GTX 870M vs GRID T4-2Q Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 870M vs GRID T4-2Q FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GeForce GTX 870M vs GRID T4-2Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 870M
2014Why buy it
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 225W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $845 MSRP).
GRID T4-2Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($845 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌125% higher power demand at 225W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 870M vs GRID T4-2Q Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 870M
The GeForce GTX 870M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,536 points.

GRID T4-2Q
The GRID T4-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,668 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 870M scores 3,536 and the GRID T4-2Q reaches 3,668 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 870M is built on Kepler while the GRID T4-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 870M) vs 2,048 (GRID T4-2Q). Raw compute: 2.599 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 870M) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID T4-2Q). Boost clocks: 967 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 870M | GRID T4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,536 | 3,668+4% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1344 | 2048+52% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.599 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+86% |
| Boost Clock | 967 MHz | 1178 MHz+22% |
| ROPs | 24 | 64+167% |
| TMUs | 112 | 128+14% |
| L1 Cache | 112 KB | 768 KB+586% |
| L2 Cache | 0.38 MB | 2 MB+426% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 870M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID T4-2Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 870M | GRID T4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 870M has 6 GB of VRAM, while the GRID T4-2Q carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 870M gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 870M and 64-bit on the GRID T4-2Q. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (GeForce GTX 870M) vs 2 MB (GRID T4-2Q) — the GRID T4-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 870M | GRID T4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+200% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.38 MB | 2 MB+426% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 870M) vs 12 Ultimate (GRID T4-2Q). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 870M | GRID T4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GTX 870M) vs NVENC 6th Gen (GRID T4-2Q). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs NVDEC 4th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 870M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (GRID T4-2Q).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 870M | GRID T4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) | NVENC 6th Gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | NVDEC 4th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 870M draws 100W versus the GRID T4-2Q's 225W — a 76.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 870M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 870M) vs 350W (GRID T4-2Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 870M | GRID T4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-56% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 35.4+117% | 16.3 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GRID T4-2Q (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 870M | GRID T4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $845 |
| Codename | GK104 | GM204 |
| Release | March 12 2014 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #538 | #433 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














