GeForce GTX 870M vs Radeon Pro 560

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 870M vs Radeon Pro 560 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 870M vs Radeon Pro 560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 870M

2014

Why buy it

✅2.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.

Radeon Pro 560

2017

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 870M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 870M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.8% in PassMark G3D (3,536 vs 3,475), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 870M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Pro 560 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro 560 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 870M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 870M vs Radeon Pro 560 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 870M

The GeForce GTX 870M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,536 points.

Radeon Pro 560

The Radeon Pro 560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,475 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 870M scores 3,536 and the Radeon Pro 560 reaches 3,475 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 870M is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro 560 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 870M) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 560). Raw compute: 2.599 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 870M) vs 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 560).

Feature	GeForce GTX 870M	Radeon Pro 560
G3D Mark Score	3,536+2%	3,475
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1344+31%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.599 TFLOPS+40%	1.858 TFLOPS
ROPs	24+50%	16
TMUs	112+75%	64
L1 Cache	112 KB	256 KB+129%
L2 Cache	0.38 MB	1 MB+163%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 870M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro 560 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 870M	Radeon Pro 560
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 870M has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 560 carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 870M gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 870M and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 560. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (GeForce GTX 870M) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 560) — the Radeon Pro 560 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 870M	Radeon Pro 560
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+200%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.38 MB	1 MB+163%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 870M draws 100W versus the Radeon Pro 560's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon Pro 560 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 870M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 560). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 870M	Radeon Pro 560
TDP	100W	75W-25%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	35.4	46.3+31%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon Pro 560 (2017 vs 2014).

Feature	GeForce GTX 870M	Radeon Pro 560
MSRP	—	$500
Codename	GK104	Polaris 21
Release	March 12 2014	April 18 2017
Ranking	#538	#543

Search GeForce GTX 870M on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro 560 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.