GeForce GTX 880M vs GeForce GTX 1650

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 880M

2014Core: 954 MHzBoost: 993 MHz
Similar parts
··
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
GTX family
·······

GeForce GTX 880M vs GeForce GTX 1650 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 880M vs GeForce GTX 1650 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 880M vs GeForce GTX 1650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 880M

2014

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
  • Measures 1mm instead of 229mm, a 228mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • 62.7% higher power demand at 122W vs 75W.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • 30.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • GeForce GTX 880M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 75W instead of 122W, a 47W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 22800% longer card at 229mm vs 1mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 30.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 105.7% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 3,826), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 880M vs GeForce GTX 1650 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 880M

The GeForce GTX 880M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 954 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,826 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 880M scores 3,826 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 105.7%. The GeForce GTX 880M is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 3.05 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 993 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 880MGeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score
3,826
7,869+106%
Architecture
Kepler
Turing
Process Node
28 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
1536+71%
896
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.05 TFLOPS+2%
2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
993 MHz
1665 MHz+68%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
128+129%
56
L1 Cache
128 KB
896 KB+600%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 880MGeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 880M has 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 880M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 160 GB/s (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 25% advantage for the GeForce GTX 880M. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 880M and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 880MGeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+100%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
160 GB/s+25%
128 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GTX 880MGeForce GTX 1650
DirectX
12_0
12
Max Displays
0
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 880M) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs NVDEC 4th gen.

FeatureGeForce GTX 880MGeForce GTX 1650
Encoder
NVENC 1st Gen
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder
NVDEC 1st Gen
NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 880M draws 122W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 47.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 1mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 880MGeForce GTX 1650
TDP
122W
75W-39%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
1mm
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
31.4
104.9+234%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce GTX 880MGeForce GTX 1650
MSRP
$149
Codename
GK104
TU117
Release
March 12 2014
April 23 2019
Ranking
#514
#323

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.