
GeForce GTX 880M

T400 4GB
GeForce GTX 880M vs T400 4GB Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 880M vs T400 4GB FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GeForce GTX 880M vs T400 4GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 880M
2014Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 156mm, a 155mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 23.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ❌306.7% higher power demand at 122W vs 30W.
T400 4GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅GeForce GTX 880M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so T400 4GB is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 122W, a 92W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌15500% longer card at 156mm vs 1mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 880M vs T400 4GB Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 880M
The GeForce GTX 880M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 954 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,826 points.
T400 4GB
The T400 4GB is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 880M scores 3,826 and the T400 4GB reaches 3,803 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 880M is built on Kepler while the T400 4GB uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 384 (T400 4GB). Raw compute: 3.05 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (T400 4GB). Boost clocks: 993 MHz vs 1425 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 880M | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,826 | 3,803 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+300% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.05 TFLOPS+179% | 1.094 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 993 MHz | 1425 MHz+44% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+433% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 384 KB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 880M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The T400 4GB leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 880M | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 880M has 8 GB of VRAM, while the T400 4GB carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 880M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 880M and 64-bit on the T400 4GB. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 1 MB (T400 4GB) — the T400 4GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 880M | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 12_0 (T400 4GB). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 880M | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0 | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 880M) vs NVENC 7th Gen (T400 4GB). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs NVDEC 4th Gen.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 880M | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st Gen | NVDEC 4th Gen |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 880M draws 122W versus the T400 4GB's 30W — a 121.1% difference. The T400 4GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 350W (T400 4GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 156mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 880M | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 122W | 30W-75% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 156mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 31.4 | 126.8+304% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is T400 4GB (2021 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 880M | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $159 |
| Codename | GK104 | TU117 |
| Release | March 12 2014 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #514 | #518 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















