GeForce GTX 880M vs T400 4GB

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 880M

2014Core: 954 MHzBoost: 993 MHz
Similar parts
··
VS

T400 4GB

2021Core: 420 MHzBoost: 1425 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 880M vs T400 4GB Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 880M vs T400 4GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 880M

2014

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Measures 1mm instead of 156mm, a 155mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 23.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
  • 306.7% higher power demand at 122W vs 30W.

T400 4GB

2021

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • GeForce GTX 880M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so T400 4GB is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 30W instead of 122W, a 92W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 15500% longer card at 156mm vs 1mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 880M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.6% in PassMark G3D (3,826 vs 3,803), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
T400 4GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
T400 4GB makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce GTX 880M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 880M vs T400 4GB Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 880M

The GeForce GTX 880M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 954 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,826 points.

T400 4GB

The T400 4GB is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 880M scores 3,826 and the T400 4GB reaches 3,803 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 880M is built on Kepler while the T400 4GB uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 384 (T400 4GB). Raw compute: 3.05 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (T400 4GB). Boost clocks: 993 MHz vs 1425 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 880MT400 4GB
G3D Mark Score
3,826
3,803
Architecture
Kepler
Turing
Process Node
28 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
1536+300%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.05 TFLOPS+179%
1.094 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
993 MHz
1425 MHz+44%
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
128+433%
24
L1 Cache
128 KB
384 KB+200%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 880M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The T400 4GB leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 880MT400 4GB
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 880M has 8 GB of VRAM, while the T400 4GB carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 880M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 880M and 64-bit on the T400 4GB. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 1 MB (T400 4GB) — the T400 4GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 880MT400 4GB
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+300%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
256-bit+300%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 12_0 (T400 4GB). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GTX 880MT400 4GB
DirectX
12_0
12_0
Max Displays
0
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 880M) vs NVENC 7th Gen (T400 4GB). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs NVDEC 4th Gen.

FeatureGeForce GTX 880MT400 4GB
Encoder
NVENC 1st Gen
NVENC 7th Gen
Decoder
NVDEC 1st Gen
NVDEC 4th Gen
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 880M draws 122W versus the T400 4GB's 30W — a 121.1% difference. The T400 4GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 350W (T400 4GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 156mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 880MT400 4GB
TDP
122W
30W-75%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
156mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Perf/Watt
31.4
126.8+304%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is T400 4GB (2021 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce GTX 880MT400 4GB
MSRP
$159
Codename
GK104
TU117
Release
March 12 2014
May 6 2021
Ranking
#514
#518

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.