GeForce GTX 880M vs GRID V100-2Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 880M vs GRID V100-2Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 880M vs GRID V100-2Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 880M

2014

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 122W instead of 225W, a 103W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $10,000 MSRP).

GRID V100-2Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($10,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌84.4% higher power demand at 225W vs 122W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 880M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.4% in PassMark G3D (3,826 vs 3,811), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 880M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID V100-2Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID V100-2Q is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 880M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 880M vs GRID V100-2Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 880M

The GeForce GTX 880M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 954 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,826 points.

GRID V100-2Q

The GRID V100-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,811 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 880M scores 3,826 and the GRID V100-2Q reaches 3,811 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 880M is built on Kepler while the GRID V100-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 2,048 (GRID V100-2Q). Raw compute: 3.05 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID V100-2Q). Boost clocks: 993 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 880M	GRID V100-2Q
G3D Mark Score	3,826	3,811
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1536	2048+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.05 TFLOPS	4.825 TFLOPS+58%
Boost Clock	993 MHz	1178 MHz+19%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	128	128
L1 Cache	128 KB	768 KB+500%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 880M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID V100-2Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 880M	GRID V100-2Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 880M has 8 GB of VRAM, while the GRID V100-2Q carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 880M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 880M and 64-bit on the GRID V100-2Q. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 2 MB (GRID V100-2Q) — the GRID V100-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 880M	GRID V100-2Q
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+300%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit+300%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 880M draws 122W versus the GRID V100-2Q's 225W — a 59.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 880M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 350W (GRID V100-2Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 880M	GRID V100-2Q
TDP	122W-46%	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	1mm	—
Slots	0	—
Perf/Watt	31.4+86%	16.9

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GRID V100-2Q (2015 vs 2014).

Feature	GeForce GTX 880M	GRID V100-2Q
MSRP	—	$10000
Codename	GK104	GM204
Release	March 12 2014	August 30 2015
Ranking	#514	#433

Search GeForce GTX 880M on Amazon

Search GRID V100-2Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.