
GeForce GTX 880M
Popular choices:

GRID M60-1Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 880M
2014Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 122W instead of 225W, a 103W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
GRID M60-1Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌84.4% higher power demand at 225W vs 122W.
GeForce GTX 880M
2014GRID M60-1Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 122W instead of 225W, a 103W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌84.4% higher power demand at 225W vs 122W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 880M better than GRID M60-1Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GRID M60-1Q make more sense than GeForce GTX 880M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 880M | GRID M60-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 84 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 35 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 880M | GRID M60-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 101 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 24 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 880M | GRID M60-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 42 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 880M | GRID M60-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 880M and GRID M60-1Q

GeForce GTX 880M
GeForce GTX 880M
The GeForce GTX 880M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 954 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,826 points.

GRID M60-1Q
GRID M60-1Q
The GRID M60-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,695 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 880M scores 3,826 and the GRID M60-1Q reaches 3,695 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 880M is built on Kepler while the GRID M60-1Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-1Q). Raw compute: 3.05 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-1Q). Boost clocks: 993 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 880M | GRID M60-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,826+4% | 3,695 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2048+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.05 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+58% |
| Boost Clock | 993 MHz | 1178 MHz+19% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 768 KB+500% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 880M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GRID M60-1Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 880M | GRID M60-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 880M comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M60-1Q has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 880M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 2 MB (GRID M60-1Q) — the GRID M60-1Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 880M | GRID M60-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 880M draws 122W versus the GRID M60-1Q's 225W — a 59.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 880M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 350W (GRID M60-1Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 880M | GRID M60-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 122W-46% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 31.4+91% | 16.4 |
Value Analysis
The GRID M60-1Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 880M | GRID M60-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $2500 |
| Codename | GK104 | GM204 |
| Release | March 12 2014 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #514 | #525 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












