
GeForce GTX 960M
Popular choices:

Maxwell GPU Surface Book
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 960M
2015Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 22.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.
Maxwell GPU Surface Book
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce GTX 960M
2015Maxwell GPU Surface Book
2015Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 22.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 960M better than Maxwell GPU Surface Book?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Maxwell GPU Surface Book still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960M | Maxwell GPU Surface Book |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 13 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 22 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 11 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960M | Maxwell GPU Surface Book |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 12 FPS | 18 FPS |
| medium | 10 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 8 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 7 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960M | Maxwell GPU Surface Book |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 37 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960M | Maxwell GPU Surface Book |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 960M and Maxwell GPU Surface Book

GeForce GTX 960M
GeForce GTX 960M
The GeForce GTX 960M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1096 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,375 points.
Maxwell GPU Surface Book
Maxwell GPU Surface Book
The Maxwell GPU Surface Book is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in October 1 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 954 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 960M scores 3,375 and the Maxwell GPU Surface Book reaches 3,311 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 960M is built on Maxwell while the Maxwell GPU Surface Book uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 960M) vs 384 (Maxwell GPU Surface Book). Boost clocks: 1176 MHz vs 993 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960M | Maxwell GPU Surface Book |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,375+2% | 3,311 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+67% | 384 |
| Boost Clock | 1176 MHz+18% | 993 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 960M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Maxwell GPU Surface Book relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960M | Maxwell GPU Surface Book |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 960M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Maxwell GPU Surface Book has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 960M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960M | Maxwell GPU Surface Book |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 960M) vs 12 (11_0) (Maxwell GPU Surface Book). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960M | Maxwell GPU Surface Book |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (4th Gen) (GeForce GTX 960M) vs None (Maxwell GPU Surface Book). Decoder: NVDEC (1st Gen) vs PureVideo VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 960M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Maxwell GPU Surface Book).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960M | Maxwell GPU Surface Book |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (4th Gen) | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC (1st Gen) | PureVideo VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,H.265 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 960M draws 75W versus the Maxwell GPU Surface Book's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The Maxwell GPU Surface Book is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 960M) vs 350W (Maxwell GPU Surface Book). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 82 vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960M | Maxwell GPU Surface Book |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 30W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 82-4% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 45.0 | 110.4+145% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














