GeForce GTX 590
VS
GeForce GTX 960M

GeForce GTX 590 vs GeForce GTX 960M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 590

2011Core: 607 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 960M

2015Core: 1096 MHzBoost: 1176 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 960M

#25
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
161%
#27
146%
#28
145%
#32
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
132%
#33
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
131%
#35
GeForce GTX 960M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
100%
#37
98%
#46
Radeon RX 5500M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100
88%
#48
GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150
87%
#49
GeForce 610M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $20
87%
#50
GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $75
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 960M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (4 GB vs 3 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 590.

InsightGeForce GTX 590GeForce GTX 960M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1%)
Leading raw performance (+1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+33.3%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 960M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 960M holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $100), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 102% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GTX 590GeForce GTX 960M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+102%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100)
More affordable ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 590 and GeForce GTX 960M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 590

The GeForce GTX 590 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 24 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 1024 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 365W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,341 points. Launch price was $699.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 960M

The GeForce GTX 960M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1096 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,375 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 590 scores 3,341 and the GeForce GTX 960M reaches 3,375 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 590 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 960M uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 590) vs 640 (GeForce GTX 960M). Raw compute: 1.244 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX 590) vs 1.505 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 960M).

FeatureGeForce GTX 590GeForce GTX 960M
G3D Mark Score
3,341
3,375+1%
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Maxwell
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1024 ×2+60%
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.244 TFLOPS ×2
1.505 TFLOPS+21%
ROPs
48 ×2+200%
16
TMUs
64 ×2+60%
40
L1 Cache
1 MB+223%
0.31 MB
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
2 MB+167%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 590GeForce GTX 960M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 590 comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 960M has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 960M offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (GeForce GTX 590) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 960M) — the GeForce GTX 960M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 590GeForce GTX 960M
VRAM Capacity
3 GB
4 GB+33%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
2 MB+167%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 590) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 960M). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 590GeForce GTX 960M
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP5) vs NVDEC (1st Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 590) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 960M).

FeatureGeForce GTX 590GeForce GTX 960M
Encoder
NVENC (4th Gen)
Decoder
PureVideo HD (VP5)
NVDEC (1st Gen)
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,H.265
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 590 draws 365W versus the GeForce GTX 960M's 75W — a 131.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 960M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce GTX 590) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 960M). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 82.

FeatureGeForce GTX 590GeForce GTX 960M
TDP
365W
75W-79%
Recommended PSU
700W
350W-50%
Power Connector
2x 8-pin
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
90°C
82-9%
Perf/Watt
9.2
45.0+389%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 960M costs 50% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 33.4 (GeForce GTX 590) vs 67.5 (GeForce GTX 960M) — the GeForce GTX 960M offers 102.1% better value. The GeForce GTX 960M is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GTX 590GeForce GTX 960M
MSRP
$699
Avg Price (30d)
$100
$50-50%
Performance per Dollar
33.4
67.5+102%
Codename
GF110
GM107
Release
March 24 2011
March 13 2015
Ranking
#555
#552