Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GTX 590 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 590

2011Core: 607 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

2020
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 590 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 590
3 GB 365
3,341
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 675M
brand logoGeForce GTX 745
brand logoGeForce GTX 950A
brand logoGeForce GTX 675MX
brand logoGeForce RTX 2050
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
brand logoGeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
2 GB 30
3,390
+1.5%
brand logoRadeon R7 450
brand logoRadeon HD 6970M
brand logoRadeon HD 8770
brand logoRadeon HD 6990
brand logoGeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
brand logoRadeon RX 6600 XT
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 590 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 590

2011

Why buy it

  • ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌2011 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    599% HIGHER MSRP
    $699 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.8 vs 33.9 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • ❌1116.7% higher power demand at 365W vs 30W.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

2020

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $599 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 609.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.9 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
  • ✅GeForce GTX 590 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • ✅Draws 30W instead of 365W, a 335W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.5% in PassMark G3D (3,390 vs 3,341), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 10nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $599 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $699, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 609.3% (33.9 vs 4.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 590 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 590

The GeForce GTX 590 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 24 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 1024 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 365W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,341 points. Launch price was $699.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,390 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 590 scores 3,341 and the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 reaches 3,390 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 590 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 40 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 590) vs 96 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).

FeatureGeForce GTX 590Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
G3D Mark Score
3,341
3,390+1%
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Process Node
40 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
1024 ×2+967%
96
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 590 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 590Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 590 has 3 GB of VRAM, while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 590 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 590 and 64-bit on the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7.

FeatureGeForce GTX 590Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
VRAM Capacity
3 GB+50%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
256-bit+300%
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 590) vs 12.1 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 590Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP5) vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 590) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).

FeatureGeForce GTX 590Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Encoder
—
QuickSync
Decoder
PureVideo HD (VP5)
QuickSync
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 590 draws 365W versus the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7's 30W — a 169.6% difference. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce GTX 590) vs 350W (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 85.

FeatureGeForce GTX 590Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
TDP
365W
30W-92%
Recommended PSU
700W
350W-50%
Power Connector
2x 8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
—
0mm
Height
—
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
90°C
85-6%
Perf/Watt
9.2
113.0+1128%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 590 came in at $699, while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 launched at $100. On MSRP, Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 was 85.7% cheaper ($599 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.8 (GeForce GTX 590) vs 33.9 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) — the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 offers 606.3% better value. The newer card here is Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 (2020 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GTX 590Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
MSRP
$699
$100-86%
Performance per Dollar
4.8
33.9+606%
Codename
GF110
Tiger Lake Xe
Release
March 24 2011
August 15 2020
Ranking
#555
#508
Search GeForce GTX 590 on AmazonSearch Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.