
GeForce GTX 590

Tesla C2050 / C2070
GeForce GTX 590 vs Tesla C2050 / C2070 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 590 vs Tesla C2050 / C2070 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GeForce GTX 590 vs Tesla C2050 / C2070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 590
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,800 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 248.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.8 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2011 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌53.4% higher power demand at 365W vs 238W.
Tesla C2050 / C2070
2011Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅Draws 238W instead of 365W, a 127W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Fermi (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌257.5% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$699 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 590 vs Tesla C2050 / C2070 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 590
The GeForce GTX 590 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 24 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 1024 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 365W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,341 points. Launch price was $699.

Tesla C2050 / C2070
The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,428 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 590 scores 3,341 and the Tesla C2050 / C2070 reaches 3,428 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 590 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Tesla C2050 / C2070 uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 590) vs 448 (Tesla C2050 / C2070). Raw compute: 1.244 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX 590) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2050 / C2070).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 590 | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,341 | 3,428+3% |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 ×2+129% | 448 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.244 TFLOPS ×2+21% | 1.028 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48 ×2 | 48 |
| TMUs | 64 ×2+14% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+14% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB | 768 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 590 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 590 | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 590 has 3 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla C2050 / C2070 carries 6 GB. Tesla C2050 / C2070 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 590 and 64-bit on the Tesla C2050 / C2070.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 590 | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 6 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB | 768 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 590) vs 11_0 (Tesla C2050 / C2070). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 590 | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0)+9% | 11_0 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 590 draws 365W versus the Tesla C2050 / C2070's 238W — a 42.1% difference. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce GTX 590) vs 350W (Tesla C2050 / C2070). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 590 | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 365W | 238W-35% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 350W-50% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 248mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 9.2 | 14.4+57% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 590 came in at $699, while the Tesla C2050 / C2070 launched at $2499. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 590 was 72% cheaper ($1800 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.8 (GeForce GTX 590) vs 1.4 (Tesla C2050 / C2070) — the GeForce GTX 590 offers 242.9% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 590 | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699-72% | $2499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.8+243% | 1.4 |
| Codename | GF110 | GF100 |
| Release | March 24 2011 | July 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #555 | #569 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














