G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 590 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 590 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 590

2011

Why buy it

✅76.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
313.6% HIGHER MSRP
$699 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.8 vs 20.2 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
❌172.4% higher power demand at 365W vs 134W.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $530 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
✅Delivers 322.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.2 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
✅Draws 134W instead of 365W, a 231W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 590 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 590 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 76.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST instead at 3,415 vs 3,341, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 590 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 3 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST makes the most sense to buy today. It is $530 cheaper on MSRP at $169 vs $699, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 322.8% (20.2 vs 4.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 590 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 590 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 590

The GeForce GTX 590 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 24 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 1024 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 365W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,341 points. Launch price was $699.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 134W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,415 points. Launch price was $169.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 590 scores 3,341 and the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST reaches 3,415 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 590 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 590) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST). Raw compute: 1.244 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX 590) vs 1.585 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST).

Feature	GeForce GTX 590	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
G3D Mark Score	3,341	3,415+2%
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Kepler
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1024 ×2+33%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.244 TFLOPS ×2	1.585 TFLOPS+27%
ROPs	48 ×2+100%	24
TMUs	64 ×2	64
L1 Cache	1 MB+1567%	0.06 MB
L2 Cache	768 KB+100%	384 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 590	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 590 has 3 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 590 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 590 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST. L2 Cache: 768 KB (GeForce GTX 590) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) — the GeForce GTX 590 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 590	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
VRAM Capacity	3 GB+50%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	768 KB+100%	384 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 590) vs 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 590	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (FL 11_0)
OpenGL	4.6+5%	4.4
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP5) vs PureVideo VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 590) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST).

Feature	GeForce GTX 590	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
Encoder	—	NVENC 1st gen
Decoder	PureVideo HD (VP5)	PureVideo VP5
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 590 draws 365W versus the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST's 134W — a 92.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce GTX 590) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 97°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 590	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
TDP	365W	134W-63%
Recommended PSU	700W	450W-36%
Power Connector	2x 8-pin	1x 6-pin
Length	—	241mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	90°C-7%	97°C
Perf/Watt	9.2	25.5+177%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 590 came in at $699, while the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST launched at $169. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST was 75.8% cheaper ($530 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.8 (GeForce GTX 590) vs 20.2 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) — the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST offers 320.8% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST (2013 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce GTX 590	GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
MSRP	$699	$169-76%
Performance per Dollar	4.8	20.2+321%
Codename	GF110	GK106
Release	March 24 2011	March 26 2013
Ranking	#555	#551

Search GeForce GTX 590 on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.