GeForce GTX 960M vs Quadro P600

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 960M vs Quadro P600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 960M vs Quadro P600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 960M

2015

Why buy it

✅6.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌87.5% higher power demand at 75W vs 40W.

Quadro P600

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 40W instead of 75W, a 35W reduction.
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 960M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 960M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 6.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.7% in PassMark G3D (3,375 vs 3,318), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 960M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 960M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 960M vs Quadro P600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 960M

The GeForce GTX 960M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1096 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,375 points.

Quadro P600

The Quadro P600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1430 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,318 points. Launch price was $178.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 960M scores 3,375 and the Quadro P600 reaches 3,318 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 960M is built on Maxwell while the Quadro P600 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 960M) vs 384 (Quadro P600). Raw compute: 1.505 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 960M) vs 1.244 TFLOPS (Quadro P600). Boost clocks: 1176 MHz vs 1620 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 960M	Quadro P600
G3D Mark Score	3,375+2%	3,318
Architecture	Maxwell	Pascal
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	640+67%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.505 TFLOPS+21%	1.244 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1176 MHz	1620 MHz+38%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40+67%	24
L1 Cache	320 KB+122%	144 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 960M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 960M	Quadro P600
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 960M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P600 carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 960M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 960M and 64-bit on the Quadro P600. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 960M) vs 1 MB (Quadro P600) — the GeForce GTX 960M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 960M	Quadro P600
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 960M) vs 12_1 (Quadro P600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 960M	Quadro P600
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12_1
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (4th Gen) (GeForce GTX 960M) vs NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P600). Decoder: NVDEC (1st Gen) vs NVDEC 4th Gen.

Feature	GeForce GTX 960M	Quadro P600
Encoder	NVENC (4th Gen)	NVENC 6th Gen
Decoder	NVDEC (1st Gen)	NVDEC 4th Gen
Codecs	MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,H.265	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 960M draws 75W versus the Quadro P600's 40W — a 60.9% difference. The Quadro P600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 960M) vs 350W (Quadro P600). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 145mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 960M	Quadro P600
TDP	75W	40W-47%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	145mm
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	82	—
Perf/Watt	45.0	83.0+84%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro P600 (2017 vs 2015).

Feature	GeForce GTX 960M	Quadro P600
MSRP	—	$0
Codename	GM107	GP107
Release	March 13 2015	February 7 2017
Ranking	#552	#558

Search GeForce GTX 960M on Amazon

Search Quadro P600 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.