GeForce GTX 965M vs GRID V100-2Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 965M vs GRID V100-2Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 965M vs GRID V100-2Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 965M

2016

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 50W instead of 225W, a 175W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $10,000 MSRP).

GRID V100-2Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($10,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌350% higher power demand at 225W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 965M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.3% in PassMark G3D (3,860 vs 3,811), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 965M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2015. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID V100-2Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID V100-2Q is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 965M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 965M vs GRID V100-2Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 965M

The GeForce GTX 965M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 944 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,860 points.

GRID V100-2Q

The GRID V100-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,811 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 965M scores 3,860 and the GRID V100-2Q reaches 3,811 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 965M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GRID V100-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 965M) vs 2,048 (GRID V100-2Q). Raw compute: 2.355 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 965M) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID V100-2Q). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 965M	GRID V100-2Q
G3D Mark Score	3,860+1%	3,811
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1024	2048+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.355 TFLOPS	4.825 TFLOPS+105%
Boost Clock	1150 MHz	1178 MHz+2%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	64	128+100%
L1 Cache	384 KB	768 KB+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 965M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID V100-2Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 965M	GRID V100-2Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 965M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID V100-2Q carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 965M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 965M and 64-bit on the GRID V100-2Q. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 965M) vs 2 MB (GRID V100-2Q) — the GRID V100-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 965M	GRID V100-2Q
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 965M draws 50W versus the GRID V100-2Q's 225W — a 127.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 965M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 965M) vs 350W (GRID V100-2Q). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 965M	GRID V100-2Q
TDP	50W-78%	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	77.2+357%	16.9

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 965M (2016 vs 2015).

Feature	GeForce GTX 965M	GRID V100-2Q
MSRP	—	$10000
Codename	GM206S	GM204
Release	2016	August 30 2015
Ranking	#510	#433

Search GeForce GTX 965M on Amazon

Search GRID V100-2Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.