
GeForce GTX 965M

GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 965M vs GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 965M vs GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 965M vs GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 965M
2016Why buy it
- ✅26.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
2018Why buy it
- ✅GeForce GTX 965M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 965M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 965M vs GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 965M
The GeForce GTX 965M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 944 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,860 points.

GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
The GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1190 MHz to 1328 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,925 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 965M scores 3,860 and the GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q reaches 3,925 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 965M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 965M) vs 640 (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q). Raw compute: 2.355 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 965M) vs 1.7 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 1328 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 965M | GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,860 | 3,925+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+60% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.355 TFLOPS+39% | 1.7 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 1328 MHz+15% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+60% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB+60% | 240 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 965M | GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 965M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 965M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 80 GB/s (GeForce GTX 965M) vs 112.1 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q) — a 40.1% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 965M and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 965M | GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 112.1 GB/s+40% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce GTX 965M) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 965M | GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th Gen (HEVC) (GeForce GTX 965M) vs NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP6) vs NVDEC (3rd Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 965M) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 965M | GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th Gen (HEVC) | NVENC (6th Gen) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP6) | NVDEC (3rd Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 965M draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q's 75W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX 965M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 965M) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 965M | GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-33% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 77.2+48% | 52.3 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













