GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon HD 8970M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 965M

2016Core: 944 MHzBoost: 1150 MHz
Similar parts
··
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 8970M

2013Core: 850 MHzBoost: 900 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon HD 8970M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon HD 8970M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon HD 8970M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 965M

2016

Why buy it

  • Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
  • More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8970M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 8970M

2013

Why buy it

  • 2.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 8970M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.4% in PassMark G3D (3,876 vs 3,860), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 965M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2016 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 8970M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 8970M is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 965M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon HD 8970M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 965M

The GeForce GTX 965M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 944 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,860 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 8970M

The Radeon HD 8970M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 14 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,876 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 965M scores 3,860 and the Radeon HD 8970M reaches 3,876 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 965M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon HD 8970M uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 965M) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 8970M). Raw compute: 2.355 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 965M) vs 2.304 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8970M). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 900 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 965MRadeon HD 8970M
G3D Mark Score
3,860
3,876
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1024
1280+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.355 TFLOPS+2%
2.304 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1150 MHz+28%
900 MHz
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
64
80+25%
L1 Cache
384 KB+20%
320 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 965M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 8970M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 965MRadeon HD 8970M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 965M and System on the Radeon HD 8970M. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 965M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 8970M) — the GeForce GTX 965M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 965MRadeon HD 8970M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
80 GB/s
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 965M draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 8970M's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 965M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 965M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8970M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce GTX 965MRadeon HD 8970M
TDP
50W-50%
100W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
77.2+99%
38.8