GeForce GTX 965M vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 965M is positioned at rank #39 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Great cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 965M

#16

Radeon RX 7600S

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

90%

#29

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

169%

#31

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

153%

#32

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

153%

#36

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

139%

#37

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

138%

#39

GeForce GTX 965M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#46

Radeon RX 5500M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

93%

#48

GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

92%

#49

GeForce 610M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $20

91%

#50

GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $75

90%

#53

GeForce GTX 980M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $80

88%

#54

GeForce GTX 770M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40

87%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 965M.

Insight	GeForce GTX 965M	GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 750 Ti remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 965M Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 750 Ti Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 965M and GeForce GTX 750 Ti

GeForce GTX 965M

The GeForce GTX 965M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 944 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,860 points.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,900 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 965M scores 3,860 and the GeForce GTX 750 Ti reaches 3,900 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 965M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 750 Ti uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 965M) vs 640 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti). Raw compute: 2.355 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 965M) vs 1.389 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 750 Ti). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 1085 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 965M	GeForce GTX 750 Ti
G3D Mark Score	3,860	3,900+1%
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Maxwell
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1024+60%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.355 TFLOPS+70%	1.389 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1150 MHz+6%	1085 MHz
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	64+60%	40
L1 Cache	384 KB+20%	320 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 965M	GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 80 GB/s (GeForce GTX 965M) vs 86.4 GB/s (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) — a 8% advantage for the GeForce GTX 750 Ti. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 965M) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 750 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 965M	GeForce GTX 750 Ti
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	80 GB/s	86.4 GB/s+8%
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce GTX 965M) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 750 Ti). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GTX 965M	GeForce GTX 750 Ti
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.4+17%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th Gen (HEVC) (GeForce GTX 965M) vs NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 750 Ti). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP6) vs PureVideo HD. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 965M) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti).

Feature	GeForce GTX 965M	GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Encoder	NVENC 5th Gen (HEVC)	NVENC 1st Gen
Decoder	PureVideo HD (VP6)	PureVideo HD
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 965M draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX 750 Ti's 75W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX 965M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 965M) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 750 Ti). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 145mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 65.

Feature	GeForce GTX 965M	GeForce GTX 750 Ti
TDP	50W-33%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	None
Length	0mm	145mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	65-19%
Perf/Watt	77.2+48%	52.0