GeForce GTX 965M vs T400 4GB

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 965M

2016Core: 944 MHzBoost: 1150 MHz
VS

T400 4GB

2021Core: 420 MHzBoost: 1425 MHz

GeForce GTX 965M vs T400 4GB Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 965M vs T400 4GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 965M

2016

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 23.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
  • 66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.

T400 4GB

2021

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • GeForce GTX 965M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so T400 4GB is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 965M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.5% in PassMark G3D (3,860 vs 3,803), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
T400 4GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
T400 4GB makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce GTX 965M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 965M vs T400 4GB Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 965M

The GeForce GTX 965M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 944 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,860 points.

T400 4GB

The T400 4GB is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 965M scores 3,860 and the T400 4GB reaches 3,803 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 965M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the T400 4GB uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 965M) vs 384 (T400 4GB). Raw compute: 2.355 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 965M) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (T400 4GB). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 1425 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 965MT400 4GB
G3D Mark Score
3,860+1%
3,803
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Turing
Process Node
28 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
1024+167%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.355 TFLOPS+115%
1.094 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1425 MHz+24%
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
64+167%
24
L1 Cache
384 KB
384 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 965M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The T400 4GB leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 965MT400 4GB
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 965M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the T400 4GB carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 965M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 965M and 64-bit on the T400 4GB.

FeatureGeForce GTX 965MT400 4GB
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce GTX 965M) vs 12_0 (T400 4GB). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GTX 965MT400 4GB
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12_0
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th Gen (HEVC) (GeForce GTX 965M) vs NVENC 7th Gen (T400 4GB). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP6) vs NVDEC 4th Gen.

FeatureGeForce GTX 965MT400 4GB
Encoder
NVENC 5th Gen (HEVC)
NVENC 7th Gen
Decoder
PureVideo HD (VP6)
NVDEC 4th Gen
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 965M draws 50W versus the T400 4GB's 30W — a 50% difference. The T400 4GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 965M) vs 350W (T400 4GB). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 156mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 965MT400 4GB
TDP
50W
30W-40%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
156mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
77.2
126.8+64%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is T400 4GB (2021 vs 2016).

FeatureGeForce GTX 965MT400 4GB
MSRP
$159
Codename
GM206S
TU117
Release
2016
May 6 2021
Ranking
#510
#518

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.