
GeForce GTX 980M
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 980M
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅35.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GeForce GTX 980M
2014GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅35.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than GeForce GTX 980M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 980M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 34 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 242 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 248 FPS | 363 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 290 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 242 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 181 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 242 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 121 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 55 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 980M and GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

GeForce GTX 980M
GeForce GTX 980M
The GeForce GTX 980M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1038 MHz to 1127 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,353 points.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 980M scores 7,353 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 46.2%. The GeForce GTX 980M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 1.659 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Boost clocks: 1127 MHz vs 1470 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,353 | 10,749+46% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2304+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.659 TFLOPS | 6.774 TFLOPS+308% |
| Boost Clock | 1127 MHz | 1470 MHz+30% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 96+33% | 72 |
| L1 Cache | 0.56 MB | 2.3 MB+311% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 980M is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 980M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 160 GB/s (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — a 5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. Bus width: 256-bit vs 96-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 168 GB/s+5% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+167% | 96-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2.0 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs NVDEC (7th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2.0 | NVENC (5th Gen) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | NVDEC (7th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 980M draws 100W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 35.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 160mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 70W-30% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Length | 0mm | 160mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 73.5 | 153.6+109% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $169 |
| Codename | GM204 | GA107 |
| Release | October 7 2014 | February 2 2024 |
| Ranking | #344 | #252 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












