GeForce GTX 980M vs RadeonT 780M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 980M

2014Core: 1038 MHzBoost: 1127 MHz
Similar parts
······
VS
AMD

RadeonT 780M

2024Core: 800 MHzBoost: 2900 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 980M vs RadeonT 780M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 980M vs RadeonT 780M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 980M vs RadeonT 780M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 980M

2014

Why buy it

  • 26.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 566.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 15W.

RadeonT 780M

2024

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 15W instead of 100W, a 85W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 980M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 980M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 26.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.6% in PassMark G3D (7,353 vs 7,098), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RadeonT 780M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 28nm, 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2014. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 980M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 980M is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RadeonT 780M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 980M vs RadeonT 780M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 980M

The GeForce GTX 980M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1038 MHz to 1127 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,353 points.

AMD

RadeonT 780M

The RadeonT 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,098 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 980M scores 7,353 and the RadeonT 780M reaches 7,098 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 980M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the RadeonT 780M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 768 (RadeonT 780M). Raw compute: 1.659 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 8.909 TFLOPS (RadeonT 780M). Boost clocks: 1127 MHz vs 2900 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980MRadeonT 780M
G3D Mark Score
7,353+4%
7,098
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
1536+100%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.659 TFLOPS
8.909 TFLOPS+437%
Boost Clock
1127 MHz
2900 MHz+157%
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
96+100%
48
L1 Cache
576 KB+125%
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 980M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RadeonT 780M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980MRadeonT 780M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 980M and 128-bit on the RadeonT 780M.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980MRadeonT 780M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 12.2 (RadeonT 780M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980MRadeonT 780M
DirectX
12.1
12.2
Vulkan
1.1
1.3+18%
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 2.0 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs VCN 4.0 (RadeonT 780M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RadeonT 780M).

FeatureGeForce GTX 980MRadeonT 780M
Encoder
NVENC 2.0
VCN 4.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP6
VCN 4.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 980M draws 100W versus the RadeonT 780M's 15W — a 147.8% difference. The RadeonT 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 350W (RadeonT 780M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980MRadeonT 780M
TDP
100W
15W-85%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
None
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Perf/Watt
73.5
473.2+544%