GeForce GTX 980M vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 980M vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 980M vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 980M

2014

Why buy it

✅104.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

2012

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 980M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 980M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 104.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 1650 Ti instead at 7,525 vs 7,353, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 980M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2014 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 980M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 980M vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 980M

The GeForce GTX 980M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1038 MHz to 1127 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,353 points.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 9 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 928 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,525 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 980M scores 7,353 and the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti reaches 7,525 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 980M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti). Raw compute: 1.659 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 1.425 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti).

Feature	GeForce GTX 980M	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
G3D Mark Score	7,353	7,525+2%
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1536+100%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.659 TFLOPS+16%	1.425 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	96+50%	64
L1 Cache	576 KB+800%	64 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 980M	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 160 GB/s (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) — a 20% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 980M and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 980M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 980M	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	160 GB/s	192 GB/s+20%
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GTX 980M	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
DirectX	12.1	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.1	1.3+18%
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 2.0 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs NVENC 6 (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs NVDEC 4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti).

Feature	GeForce GTX 980M	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Encoder	NVENC 2.0	NVENC 6 (Volta)
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP6	NVDEC 4
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 980M draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 0W (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 980M	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
TDP	100W	50W-50%
Recommended PSU	350W	0W-100%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	None
Length	0mm	0mm
Height	0mm	0mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	—	75
Perf/Watt	73.5	150.5+105%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 980M (2014 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce GTX 980M	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
MSRP	—	$150
Codename	GM204	GK106
Release	October 7 2014	October 9 2012
Ranking	#344	#633

Search GeForce GTX 980M on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 1650 Ti on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.