
GeForce GTX 980M
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 980M
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ❌17.6% higher power demand at 100W vs 85W.
Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 100W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GeForce GTX 980M
2014Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
2016Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 100W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ❌17.6% higher power demand at 100W vs 85W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 980M better than Radeon RX 470 (móvel)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 470 (móvel) make more sense than GeForce GTX 980M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 14 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 248 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 79 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 980M and Radeon RX 470 (móvel)

GeForce GTX 980M
GeForce GTX 980M
The GeForce GTX 980M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1038 MHz to 1127 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,353 points.

Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 926 MHz to 1074 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,000 points. Launch price was $549.99.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 980M scores 7,353 versus the Radeon RX 470 (móvel)'s 7,000 — the GeForce GTX 980M leads by 5%. The GeForce GTX 980M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 470 (móvel) uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)). Raw compute: 1.659 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 4.399 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1127 MHz vs 1074 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,353+5% | 7,000 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2048+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.659 TFLOPS | 4.399 TFLOPS+165% |
| Boost Clock | 1127 MHz+5% | 1074 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 96 | 128+33% |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB+13% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 980M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 160 GB/s (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)) — a 40% advantage for the Radeon RX 470 (móvel). Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 224 GB/s+40% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 12 (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2.0 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce GTX 980M) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 980M draws 100W versus the Radeon RX 470 (móvel)'s 85W — a 16.2% difference. The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 980M) vs 350W (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 85W-15% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 73.5 | 82.4+12% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980M | Radeon RX 470 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $179 |
| Codename | GM204 | Ellesmere |
| Release | October 7 2014 | August 4 2016 |
| Ranking | #344 | #360 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












