GeForce MX250
GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce MX250 vs GeForce RTX 2060 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce MX250 vs GeForce RTX 2060 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce MX250 vs GeForce RTX 2060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce MX250
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $199 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 10W instead of 160W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌2019 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅459.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 155.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 15.8 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌1500% higher power demand at 160W vs 10W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce MX250 vs GeForce RTX 2060 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce MX250
The GeForce MX250 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,375 points.
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce MX250 scores 2,375 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 494.3%. The GeForce MX250 is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce MX250) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce MX250) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 1680 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX250 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,375 | 14,114+494% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1920+400% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7972 TFLOPS | 6.451 TFLOPS+709% |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | 1680 MHz+62% |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 24 | 120+400% |
| L1 Cache | 0.14 MB | 1.9 MB+1257% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 3 MB+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce MX250 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce MX250 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce MX250 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 carries 6 GB. GeForce RTX 2060 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 48 GB/s (GeForce MX250) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) — a 600% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2060. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX250 and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 2060. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce MX250) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce MX250 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 6 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 48 GB/s | 336 GB/s+600% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 3 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce MX250) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce MX250 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce MX250) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce MX250) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).
| Feature | GeForce MX250 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd Gen | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX250 draws 10W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 176.5% difference. The GeForce MX250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX250) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 72.
| Feature | GeForce MX250 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-94% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 229mm |
| Height | 0mm | 113mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 72-4% |
| Perf/Watt | 237.5+169% | 88.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce MX250 came in at $150, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349. On MSRP, GeForce MX250 was 57% cheaper ($199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.8 (GeForce MX250) vs 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 155.7% better value.
| Feature | GeForce MX250 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-57% | $349 |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.8 | 40.4+156% |
| Codename | GP108B | TU106 |
| Release | February 20 2019 | January 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #643 | #168 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce MX250 and GeForce RTX 2060
