GeForce MX250
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
GeForce MX250 vs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce MX250 vs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce MX250 vs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce MX250
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce MX250 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 10W instead of 28W, a 18W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2019 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
2020Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌180% higher power demand at 28W vs 10W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce MX250 vs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce MX250
The GeForce MX250 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,375 points.
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 48 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,400 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX250 scores 2,375 and the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs reaches 2,400 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX250 is built on Pascal while the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 14 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce MX250) vs 48 (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 1450 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX250 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,375 | 2,400+1% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+700% | 48 |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | 1450 MHz+40% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce MX250 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce MX250 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce MX250 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs carries 0 MB. GeForce MX250 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX250 and System on the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs.
| Feature | GeForce MX250 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 48 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce MX250) vs 12 (12_1) (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce MX250 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce MX250) vs Quick Sync (Tiger Lake) (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs Quick Sync (Tiger Lake). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce MX250) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs).
| Feature | GeForce MX250 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | Quick Sync (Tiger Lake) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd Gen | Quick Sync (Tiger Lake) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX250 draws 10W versus the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs's 28W — a 94.7% difference. The GeForce MX250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX250) vs 1W (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs). Power connectors: Mobile vs Integrated. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce MX250 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-64% | 28W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 237.5+177% | 85.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce MX250 came in at $150, while the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs launched at $0. On MSRP, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs was 100+% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.8 (GeForce MX250) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs) — the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce MX250 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.8 | Infinity |
| Codename | GP108B | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | February 20 2019 | August 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #643 | #712 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce MX250 and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
