GeForce MX250 vs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
GeForce MX250
Popular choices:
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce MX250 is positioned at rank #291 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX250
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce MX250 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce MX250 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) |
| Longevity | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $20 versus $150 for the GeForce MX250, it costs 87% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 657.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce MX250 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+657.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX250 and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
GeForce MX250
The GeForce MX250 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,375 points.
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 48 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,400 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX250 scores 2,375 and the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs reaches 2,400 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX250 is built on Pascal while the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 14 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce MX250) vs 48 (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 1450 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX250 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,375 | 2,400+1% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+700% | 48 |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | 1450 MHz+40% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce MX250 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce MX250 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs has 0 MB. The GeForce MX250 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce MX250 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 48 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce MX250) vs 12 (12_1) (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce MX250 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce MX250) vs Quick Sync (Tiger Lake) (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs Quick Sync (Tiger Lake). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce MX250) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs).
| Feature | GeForce MX250 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | Quick Sync (Tiger Lake) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd Gen | Quick Sync (Tiger Lake) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX250 draws 10W versus the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs's 28W — a 94.7% difference. The GeForce MX250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX250) vs 1W (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs). Power connectors: Mobile vs Integrated. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce MX250 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-64% | 28W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 237.5+177% | 85.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX250 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs launched at $0 and now averages $20. The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs costs 86.7% less ($130 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 15.8 (GeForce MX250) vs 120.0 (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs) — the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs offers 659.5% better value. The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce MX250 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $20-87% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.8 | 120.0+659% |
| Codename | GP108B | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | February 20 2019 | August 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #643 | #712 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce MX250 and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
